1 resultado para killer whale
em Archive of European Integration
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (56)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (6)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (58)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (13)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (35)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (73)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (7)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (79)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (34)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (35)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (67)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (7)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Michigan (30)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (20)
- University of Washington (6)
Resumo:
REACH is a very demanding system for any business either large or small, yet right from the start one of the more serious concerns was whether and how SMEs could cope with the Regulation. After all, some 27,600 companies in EU chemistry are SMEs (95% of all firms). Seven years down the line, many of these fears are materialising. Assuming no significant changes are introduced to REACH, this paper suggests the following recommendations: Above all, we strongly encourage SMEs to start early and develop a strategy for REACH compliance well before 2018. Address the potential competition law implications of current SIEF arrangements, e.g. through a Guidance document from DG Competition by 2014 (in time for 2018) Facilitate the exchange of information along the value chain by adopting pragmatic approach to the content and format of Safety Data Sheets. More can be done on the IT front as well, for instance by developing tools that generate compliant Safety Data Sheets. Improve the communication of REACH and its intended goals, that is, the health and environmental benefits, to the wider public. SMEs regret the unawareness of the public in the light of the enormous efforts they have to undertake. In the event of a later review of REACH, the logic should be risk-based rather than hazard-based.