2 resultados para entitlements and obligations of beneficiary

em Archive of European Integration


1. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities, and the other regulations applicable to them with regard to the establishment of renumeration, pensions and other financial entitlements in Euros (Presented by the Commission in accordance with Article 24 of the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities); 2. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 laying down the conditions and procedure for applying the tax for the benefit of the European Communities (Presented by the Commission in accordance with Article 13 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities); 3. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 122/66/EEC of the Councils laying down the list of places for which a transport allowance may be granted (Presented by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 65 (3) of the Staff Regulations); 4. Proposal for a Council Regulation (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 300/76 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shiftwork, and the rates and conditions thereof (Presented by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 56a of the Staff Regulations). COM (1998) 324 final, 20 May 1998

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Withdrawal from the EU is no more a taboo subject. However, the process by which it can happen is unclear and potentially complex. The purpose of this paper is to show that a withdrawing Member State will not only rid itself from the constraints and obligations of EU rules, but it will also have to re-invent many policies and institutions to fill the gap left by the non-application of EU rules. The paper examines closely the case of the UK and Scotland and concludes that outright exit is not the best option for a withdrawing Member State. The best, but possibly the least feasible, option is an intermediate arrangement falling between full membership and complete separation from the EU. The exact position between the two extremes can only be determined by the exit negotiations and will be influenced by the political climate that will prevail at that time. While the final destination of an acceding country is well known [full adoption of the obligations of EU membership], the exiting country will be embarking on a trip with unknown destination and full of surprises.