Biblioteca Digital

3 resultados para Oral stage

em Archive of European Integration

Oral Question 0-0082/94 pursuant to Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure. Subject: European Union Mediterranean policy: At its meeting in Corfu of 24 and 25 June 1994 the European Council instructed the Council to evaluate jointly with the Commission the European Union's overall policy for the Mediterranean basin and possible measures to strengthen that policy in the short and medium-term, including the convening of a conference to be attended by the European Union and its Mediterranean partners. That evaluation should clear the way for the decisions to be taken at the Essen European Council. Could the Commission inform Parliament of the stage reached in the evaluation which should give rise to measures designed to safeguard the peace, security, stability and well-being of the region? Session Documents 1994, Document B4-0122/94, 23 September 1994

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Oral Question (0-93/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Commission of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiations taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favour of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What Guarantee can the Commission give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occurred in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-960/83. 26 October 1983

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Oral Question (0-94/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Council of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiation taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favor of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What guarantee can the Council give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occured in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980?. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-961/83. 26 October 1983.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador: