100 resultados para Crank-Nicolson scheme


Second report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. A. on the proposals from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (COM(84) 515 final - Doc. 2-629/84) for: I. a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine; II. a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 338/79 Laying down special provisions relating to quality wines produced in specified regions; III. a regulation introducing a derogation to the scheme provided for in Regulation (EEC) No. 456/80 on the granting of temporary and permanent abandonment premiums in respect of certain areas under vines and of premiums for the renunciation of replanting; IV. a regulation on the granting for the 1985/86-1989/90 wine years of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of certain areas under vines. B. on the amendment to the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (COM(84) 539 final- Doc. 2-780/84) for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine (COM(84) 515 final of 12.9.1984). C. on the proposals from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (COM(84) 714 final - Doc. 2-1447/84) for: I. an amendment to the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine (COM(84) 515 final and COM(84) 539 final); II. an amendment to the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 338/79 Laying down special provisions relating to quality wines produced in specified regions (COM(84) 515 final). D. on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (COM(84) 775 final - Doc. 2-1481/84) for a third amendment to the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine. Working Documents 1984-85, Document 2-1575/84, 5 February 1985

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Labour immigration schemes that effectively attract qualified immigrant workers are a policy priority for many governments. But what are ‘attractive’ labour immigration schemes and policies? To whom are (or should) such policies (be) attractive? In Europe, the US is often portrayed as one of the most ‘attractive’ countries of immigration – if not the most ‘attractive’. This paper aims to analyse and provide a better understanding of the elements of the US immigration system that are supposedly attractive to foreign workers, by examining key features of the current and prospective US labour immigration rules. The paper finds that ‘attractiveness’ in this policy context is a highly malleable and flexible concept: What might be ‘attractive’ to one key stakeholder might not be to another.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This study offers an in-depth economic analysis of the two main proposals for the creation of a European unemployment insurance scheme. One proposes the creation of a harmonised European unemployment benefit scheme that would apply automatically to every eligible unemployed person. The alternative, termed ‘reinsurance’ here, would transfer funds to national unemployment insurance schemes to finance benefits from the centre to the periphery when unemployment is measurably higher than normal. The rationale behind these proposals is to set up an EU-level shock absorber to overcome coordination failures and the crisis-budget constraints of individual countries. The authors consider the possible trade-offs and challenges of, for example, the definition of the trigger, the fiscal rule and the harmonisation of national benefits. They conclude that while both options are viable, ‘reinsurance’ offers a stronger stabilisation effect for the same amount of European distribution.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This paper analyses the effects of the Single Payment Scheme (SPS) with and without farm structural change, and focuses on how income distributional effects and farm restructuring are impacted by the SPS under: alternative entitlement tradability, cross-compliance and CAP 'greening' requirements, different SPS implementation models, the entitlement stock, market imperfections and institutional regulations. The authors find that the SPS implication details are highly significant, since farmers’ benefits can range from 100% of the SPS value to a negative policy incidence, and farm structural change may also be hindered by the SPS.