Pectus Excavatum / Pectus Carinatum: tratamento cirúrgico

OBJETIVO: Apresentar os resultados obtidos com técnica única para tratamento do Pectus Excavatum e Pectus Carinatum. MÉTODO: De 1976 a 2000 foram operados, 183 portadores de Deformidades da Parede Torácica Anterior sendo 98 Pectus Carinatum (70 P. Carinatum Simétrico, 18 P. Carinatum Lateral a Direita e 10 P. Carinatum Lateral a esquerda), 62 Pectus Excavatum (57 P. Excavatum Simétrico, 4 P. Excavatum Lateral a Direita e um P. Excavatum Lateral a Esquerda), 17 Pectus Carinatum Superior, um Pectus Combinado, quatro Protusões Costais Inferiores e uma Depressão Costal. A indicação foi exclusivamente estética em 182 (99,4%) dos pacientes. Foi utilizada técnica única para Pectus Carinatum e Pectus Excavatum: incisão transversal inframamária; ressecção subpericondral de todas as cartilagens envolvidas na deformidade; dissecção retroesternal mínima; osteotomia esternal anterior, fixação da osteotomia esternal com fios de aço;utilização da placa retroesternal em casos selecionados de Pectus Excavatum; pregueamento dos feixes pericondriais para dar maior rigidez a parede torácica e auxílio na manutenção do esterno na sua posição; drenagem do tecido celular subcutâneo e do plano submuscular, sutura intradérmica da pele. RESULTADOS: Bom ou excelente em 175 (95,6%) dos pacientes. Complicações ocorreram em 14 (7,6%) pacientes: oito casos (4,5%) de seroma; um (0,5%)hematoma de parede; dois (1,0%) caso de dor torácica intensa no pós-operatório; um(1,0%) caso de deiscência parcial da sutura da pele e dois casos (1,0%) de cicatriz hipertrófica que foram tratados com ressecção e betaterapia. CONCLUSÃO: Pelos resultados estéticos alcançados, a esternocondroplastia apresentada está indicada para correção de Pectus Excavatum/Carinatum.

Pectus excavatum: abordagem terapêutica

The pectus excavatum treatment has two different approaches: non-surgical techniques (modified dynamic thoracic compressor, exercises and the vacuum bell) or surgical techniques (silastic or solid silicone implant, open surgical repair like sternochondroplasty and minimally invasive repair). The introduction of Nuss procedure improved the pectus excavatum treatment, but its low acceptance was due to the high complication rate (e.g. cardiac perfuration). The thoracoscopy use for bar mediastinal passage reduced the complication rate. In comparison with sternochondroplasty, the Nuss procedure has smaller incision, less blood loss and less operative time. However, it has more reoperations, complications, longer hospital stay and more readmission rates, more time of thoracic epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia and more need for analgesic after being discharged. Although Nuss procedure has been used in children, patients under ten years must be only observed. The Nuss procedure is applicable to moderate or light symmetrical pectus excavatum, without costal protrusion, in young and adolescents patients. Furthermore, the sternochondroplasty is applicable to severe or asymmetric pectus excavatum, with or without inferior costal protrusion. Therefore, Nuss procedure and sternocondroplasty are not antagonistic procedures, and they must be used in accordance with a treatment organogram and the technique choice must be by functional and aesthetic outcome.

Nuss procedure for Pectus excavatum repair: critical appraisal of the evidence

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of correction of pectus excavatum by the Nuss technique based on the available scientific evidence.Methods: We conducted an evidence synthesis following systematic processes of search, selection, extraction and critical appraisal. Outcomes were classified by importance and had their quality assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).Results: The process of selection of items led to the inclusion of only one systematic review, which synthesized the results of nine observational studies comparing the Nuss and Ravitch procedures. The evidence found was rated as poor and very poor quality. The Nuss procedure has increased the incidence of hemothorax (RR = 5.15; 95% CI: 1.07; 24.89), pneumothorax (RR = 5.26; 95% CI: 1.55; 17.92) and the need for reintervention (RR = 4.88; 95% CI: 2.41; 9.88) when compared to the Ravitch. There was no statistical difference between the two procedures in outcomes: general complications, blood transfusion, hospital stay and time to ambulation. The Nuss operation was faster than the Ravitch (mean difference [MD] = -69.94 minutes, 95% CI: -139.04, -0.83).Conclusion: In the absence of well-designed prospective studies to clarify the evidence, especially in terms of aesthetics and quality of life, surgical indication should be individualized and the choice of the technique based on patient preference and experience of the team.