Qualidade do solo avaliada pelo "Soil Quality Kit Test" em dois experimentos de longa duração no Rio Grande do Sul

A avaliação da qualidade do solo (QS) é importante estratégia no planejamento agrícola, possibilitando a identificação e o aprimoramento de sistemas de manejo com características de alta produtividade e de preservação ambiental. O presente estudo foi realizado em dois experimentos de longa duração (10 e 15 anos) conduzidos no Sul do Brasil e teve por objetivo avaliar o efeito de sistemas de manejo na QS, utilizando um kit de análise expedita de qualidade de solo (KQS), desenvolvido pelo Instituto de Qualidade do Solo-USDA-ARS. A eficiência desse kit foi avaliada pela comparação com os métodos tradicionais utilizados na ciência do solo. Nas duas áreas experimentais investigou-se um total de 12 tratamentos, os quais englobaram sistemas de preparo com diferentes intensidades de revolvimento do solo (preparo convencional, preparo reduzido e plantio direto) e sistemas de culturas com ampla faixa de adição de resíduos vegetais ao solo, além da aplicação de doses anuais de N-uréia, variando de 0 a 144 kg ha-1. Em cada base experimental uma área sob campo natural foi avaliada, servindo como referência da condição do solo na ausência de interferência antrópica. Como indicadores de QS, foram avaliados infiltração de água, respiração do solo, densidade do solo, teor de nitrato+nitrito (N-NO3- + N-NO2-), estabilidade de agregados em água e pH. De maneira geral, os coeficientes de correlação entre os métodos do KQS e os métodos tradicionais foram elevados, sendo o mais alto para o indicador pH (r = 0,98) e o menor para o indicador infiltração de água no solo (r = 0,42). Os tratamentos selecionados foram teoricamente ordenados em ordem crescente de QS, a qual foi reproduzida de forma eficiente pelo índice de estoque de carbono (IEC), calculado pela razão entre o estoque de C orgânico do solo, na camada de 0-5 cm, de cada tratamento e o estoque de C orgânico no solo sob campo natural. Os indicadores estabilidade de agregados, N-NO3- + N-NO2- e respiração do solo foram os mais eficientes em discriminar a QS. O KQS foi eficiente em avaliar a QS dos tratamentos nas duas áreas experimentais. Os níveis mais elevados de QS foram alcançados nos tratamentos com plantio direto e consórcio de gramíneas e leguminosas tropicais, devido à cobertura do solo e às elevadas adições de C e N via resíduos culturais.

The effect of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on yield and quality of kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea, L.)

In a greenhouse pot experiment with kohlrabi, variety Luna, we explored the joint effect of N (0.6 g N per pot = 6 kg of soil) and S in the soil (25-35-45 mg kg-1 of S) on yields, on N, S and NO3- content in tubers and leaves, and on alterations in the amino acids concentration in the tubers. S fertilisation had no effect on tuber yields. The ranges of N content in tubers and leaves were narrow (between 1.42-1.48 % N and 1.21-1.35 % N, respectively) and the effect of S fertilisation was insignificant. S concentration in the tubers ranged between 0.59 and 0.64 % S. S fertilisation had a more pronounced effect on the S concentration in leaf tissues where it increased from 0.50 to 0.58 or to 0.76 % S under the applied dose. The NO3- content was higher in tubers than in leaves. Increasing the S level in the soil significantly reduced NO3- concentrations in the tubers by 42.2-53.6 % and in the leaves by 8.8-21.7 %. Increasing the S content in the soil reduced the concentration of cysteine + methionine by 16-28 %. The values of valine, tyrosine, aspartic acid and serine were constant. In the S0, S1, and S2 treatments the levels of threonine, isoleucine, leucine, arginine, the sum of essential amino acids and alanine decreased from 37 to 9 %. The histidine concentration increased with increasing S fertilisation. S fertilisation of kohlrabi can be recommended to stabilize the yield and reduce the undesirable NO3- contained in the parts used for consumption.

Physical quality of an Oxisol cultivated with maize submited to cover crops in the pre-cropping period

The intensive use of land alters the distribution of the pore size which imparts consequences on the soil physical quality. The Least Limiting Water Range (LLWR) allows for the visualization of the effects of management systems upon either the improvement or the degradation of the soil physical quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical quality of a Red Latosol (Oxisol) submited to cover crops in the period prior to the maize crop in a no-tillage and conventional tillage system, using porosity, soil bulk density and the LLWR as attributes. The treatments were: conventional tillage (CT) and a no-tillage system with the following cover crops: sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) (NS), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke) (NP) and lablab (Dolichos lablab L.) (NL). The experimental design was randomized blocks in subdivided plots with six replications, with the plots being constituted by the treatments and the subplots by the layers analyzed. The no-tillage systems showed higher total porosity and soil organic matter at the 0-0.5 m layer for the CT. The CT did not differ from the NL or NS in relation to macroporosity. The NP showed the greater porosity, while CT and NS presented lower soil bulk density. No < 10 % airing porosity was found for the treatments evaluated, and value for water content where soil aeration is critical (θPA) was found above estimated water content at field capacity (θFC) for all densities. Critical soil bulk density was of 1.36 and 1.43 Mg m-3 for NP and CT, respectively. The LLWR in the no-tillage systems was limited in the upper part by the θFC, and in the bottom part, by the water content from which soil resistance to penetration is limiting (θPR). By means of LLWR it was observed that the soil presented good physical quality.