Comportamento do Heterocromossômio em alguns Ortópteros do Brasil

In the present paper the behavior of the heterochromoso-mes in the course of the meiotic divisions of the spermatocytes in 15 species of Orthoptera belonging to 6 different families was studied. The species treated and their respective chromosome numbers were: Phaneropteridae: Anaulacomera sp. - 1 - 2n = 30 + X, n +15+ X and 15. Anaulacomera sp. - 2 - 2n - 30 + X, n = 15+ X and 15. Stilpnochlora marginella - 2n = 30 + X, n = 15= X and 15. Scudderia sp. - 2n = 30 + X, n = 15+ X and 15. Posldippus citrifolius - 2n = 24 + X, n = 12+X and 12. Acrididae: Osmilia violacea - 2n = 22+X, n = 11 + X and 11. Tropinotus discoideus - 2n = 22+ X, n = 11 + X and 11. Leptysma dorsalis - 2n = 22 + X, n = 11-J-X and 11. Orphulella punctata - 2n = 22-f X, n = 11 + X and 11. Conocephalidae: Conocephalus sp. - 2n = 32 + X, n = 16 + X and 16. Proscopiidae: Cephalocoema zilkari - 2n = 16 + X, n = 8+ X and 8. Tetanorhynchus mendesi - 2n = 16 + X, n = 8+X and 8. Gryliidae: Gryllus assimilis - 2n = 28 + X, n = 14+X and 14. Gryllodes sp. - 2n = 20 + X, n = 10- + and 10. Phalangopsitidae: Endecous cavernicola - 2n = 18 +X, n = 94-X and 9. It was pointed out by the present writer that in the Orthoptera similarly to what he observed in the Hemiptera the heterochromosome in the heterocinetic division shows in the same individual indifferently precession, synchronism or succession. This lack of specificity is therefore pointed here as constituting the rule and not the exception as formerly beleaved by the students of this problem, since it occurs in all the species referred to in the present paper and probably also m those hitherto investigated. The variability in the behavior of the heterochromosome which can have any position with regard to the autosomes even in the same follicle is attributed to the fact that being rather a stationary body it retains in anaphase the place it had in metaphase. When this place is in the equator of the cell the heterochromosome will be left behind as soon as anaphase begins (succession). When, on the contrary, laying out of this plane as generally happens (precession) it will sooner be reached (synchronism) or passed by the autosomes (succession). Due to the less kinetic activity of the heterochromosome it does not orient itself at metaphase remaining where it stands with the kinetochore looking indifferently to any direction. At the end of anaphase and sometimes earlier the heterochromosome begins to show mitotic activities revealed by the division of its body. Then, responding to the influence of the nearer pole it moves to it being enclosed with the autosomes in the nucleus formed there. The position of the heterochromosome in the cell is explained in the following manner: It is well known that the heterochromosome of the Orthoptera is always at the periphery of the nucleus, just beneath the nuclear membrane. This position may be any in regard of the axis of the dividing cell, so that if one of the poles of the spindle comes to coincide with it, the heterochromosome will appear at this pole in the metaphasic figures. If, on the other hand, the angle formed by the axis of the spindle with the ray reaching the heterochromosome increases the latter will appear in planes farther and farther apart from the nearer pole until it finishes by being in the equatorial plane. In this way it is not difficult to understand precession, synchronism or succession. In the species in which the heterochromosome is very large as it generally happens in the Phaneropteridae, the positions corresponding to precession are much more frequent. This is due to the fact that the probabilities for the heterochromosome taking an intermediary position between the equator and the poles at the time the spindle is set up are much greater than otherwise. Moreover, standing always outside the spindle area it searches for a place exactly where this area is larger, that is, in the vicinity of the poles. If it comes to enter the spindle area, what has very little probability, it would be, in virtue of its size, propelled toward the pole by the nearing anaphasic plate. The cases of succession are justly those in which the heterochromosome taking a position parallelly to the spindle axis it can adjust its large body also in the equator or in its proximity. In the species provided with small heterochromosome (Gryllidae, Conocephalidae, Acrididae) succession is found much more frequently because here as in the Hemiptera (PIZA 1945) the heterochromosome can equally take equatorial or subequatorial positions, and, furthermore, when in the spindle area it does offer no sereous obstacle to the passage of the autosomes. The position of the heterochromosome at the periphery of the nucleus at different stages may be as I suppose, at least in part a question of density. The less colourability and the surface irregularities characteristic of this element may well correspond to a less degree of condensation which may influence passive movements. In one of the species studied here (Anaulacomera sp.- 1) included in the Phaneropteridae it was observed that the plasmosome is left motionless in the spindle as the autosomes move toward the poles. It passes to one of the secondary spermatocytes being not included in its nucleus. In the second division it again passes to one of the cells being cast off when the spermatid is being transformed into spermatozoon. Thus it is regularly found among the tails of the spermatozoa in different stages of development. In the opinion of the present writer, at least in some cases, corpuscles described as Golgi body's remanents are nothing more than discarded plasmosomes.

Estudos genéticos sôbre o milho tunicata

The study of pod corn seems still of much importance from different points of view. The phylogenetical importance of the tunicate factor as a wild type relic gene has been recently discussed in much detail by MANGELSDORF and REEVES (1939), and by BRIEGER (1943, 1944a e b). Selection experiments have shown that the pleiotropic effect of the Tu factor can be modified very extensively (BRIEGER 1944a) and some of the forms thus obtained permitt comparison of male and female inflorescences in corn and related grasses. A detailed discussion of the botanical aspect shall be given shortly. The genetic apect, finally, is the subject of the present publication. Pod corn has been obtained twice: São Paulo Pod Corn and Bolivia Pod Corn. The former came from one half ear left in our laboratory by a student and belongs to the type of corn cultivated in the State of São Paulo, while the other belongs to the Andean group, and has been received both through Dr. CARDENAS, President of the University at Cochabamba, Bolivia, and through Dr. H. C. CUTLER, Harvard University, who collected material in the Andes. The results of the studies may be summarized as follows: 1) In both cases, pod corn is characterized by the presence of a dominant Tu factor, localized in the fourth chromosome and linked with sul. The crossover value differs somewhat from the mean value of 29% given by EMERSON, BEADLE and FRAZER (1935) and was 25% in 1217 plants for São Paulo Pod Corn and 36,5% in 345 plants for Bolivia Pod Corn. However not much importance should be attributed to the quantitative differences. 2) Segregation was completely normal in Bolivia Pod Corn while São Paulo Pod Corn proved to be heterozygous for a new com uma eliminação forte, funcionam apenas 8% em vez de 50%. Existem cerca de 30% de "jcrossing-over entre o gen doce (Su/su) e o fator gametofítico; è cerca de 5% entre o gen Tu e o fator gametofítico. A ordem dos gens no cromosômio IV é: Ga4 - Tu - Sul. 3) Using BRIEGER'S formulas (1930, 1937a, 1937b) the following determinations were made. a) the elimination of ga4 pollen tubes may be strong or weak. In the former case only about 8% and in the latter 37% of ga4 pollen tubes function, instead of the 50% expected in normal heterozygotes. b) There is about 30,4% crossing-over between sul and ga4 and 5,3% between Tu and ga3, the order of the factors beeing Su 1 - Tu - Ga4. 4) The new gametophyte factor differs from the two others factors in the same chromosome, causing competition between pollen tubes. The factor Gal, ocupies another locus, considerably to the left of Sul (EMERSON, BEADLE AND FRAZSER, 1935). The gen spl ocupies another locus and causes a difference of the size of the pollen grains, besides an elimination of pollen tubes, while no such differences were observed in the case of the new factor Ga4. 5) It may be mentioned, without entering into a detailed discussion, that it seems remarquable that three of the few gametophyte factors, so far studied in detail are localized in chromosome four. Actuality there are a few more known (BRIEGER, TIDBURY AND TSENG 1938), but only one other has been localized so far, Ga2, in chromosome five between btl and prl. (BRIEGER, 1935). 6) The fourth chromosome of corn seems to contain other pecularities still. MANGELSDORF AND REEVES (1939) concluded that it carries two translocations from Tripsacum chromosomes, and BRIEGER (1944b) suggested that the tu allel may have been introduced from a tripsacoid ancestor in substitution of the wild type gene Tu at the beginning of domestication. Serious disturbances in the segregation of fourth chromosome factors have been observed (BRIEGER, unpublished) in the hybrids of Brazilian corn and Mexican teosinte, caused by gametophytic and possibly zygotic elimination. Future studies must show wether there is any relation between the frequency of factors, causing gametophyte elimination and the presence of regions of chromosomes, tranfered either from Tripsacum or a related species, by translocation or crossing-over.

Competição entre megaspórios em milho

The experiments reported were started as early as 1933, when indications were found in class material that the factor for small pollen, spl, causes not only differences in the size of pollen grains and in the growth of pollen tubes, but also a competition between megaspores, as first observed by RENNER (1921) in Oenothera. Dr. P. C. MANGELSDORF, who had kindly furnished the original seeds, was informed and the final publication delayed untill his publication in 1940. A further delay was caused by other circunstances. The main reason for the differences of the results obtained by SINGLETON and MANGELSDORF (1940) and those reported here, seems to be the way the material was analysed. I applied methods of a detailed statistical analysis, while MANGELSDORF and SINGLETON analysed pooled data. 1) The data obtained on pollen tube competition indicate .that there is about 3-4% of crossing-over between the su and sp factors in chromosome IV. The elimination is not always complete, but from 0 to 10% of the sp pollen tubes may function, instead of the 50% expected without elimination. These results are, as a whole, in accordance with SINGLETON and MANGELSDORF's data. 2) Female elimination is weaker and transmission determined as between 16 to 49,5%, instead of 50% without competition, the values being calculated by a special formula. 3) The variability of female elimination is partially genotypical, partially phenotypical. The former was shown by the difference in the behavior of the two progenies tested, while the latter was very evident when comparing the upper and lower halves of ears. For some unknown physiological reason, the elimination is generally stronger in the upper than in the lower half of the ear. 4) The female elimination of the sp gene may be caused theoretically, by either of two processes: a simple lethal effect in the female gametophyte or a competition between megaspores. The former would lead not only to the abortion of the individual megaspores, but of the whole uniovulate ovary. In the case of the latter, the abortive megaspore carrying the gene sp will be substituted in each ovule by one of the Sp megaspores and no abortion of ovaries may be observed. My observations are completely in favor of the second explication: a) The ears were as a whole very well filled except for a few incomplete ears which always appear in artificial pollinations. b) Row arrangement was always very regular. c) The number of kernels on ears with elimination is not smaller than in normal ears, but is incidentally higher : with elimnation, in back-crosses 354 kernels and in selfed ears 390 kernels, without elimination 310 kernels per ear. d) There is no correlation between the intensity of elimination and the number of grains in individual ears; the coefficient; of linear correlation, equal to 0,24, is small and insignificant. e) Our results are in complete disagreement whit those reported by SINGLETON and MANGELSDORF (1940). Since these authors present only pooled date, a complete and detailed analysis which may explain the cause of these divergences is impossible.

A ação dos gens gametofíticos com referência especial ao milho

1) The first part deals with the different processes which may complicate Mendelian segregation and which may be classified into three groups, according to BRIEGER (1937b) : a) Instability of genes, b) Abnormal segregation due to distur- bances during the meiotic divisions, c) obscured segregation, after a perfectly normal meiosis, caused by elimination or during the gonophase (gametophyte in higher plants), or during zygophase (sporophyte). Without entering into detail, it is emphasized that all the above mentioned complications in the segregation of some genes may be caused by the action of other genes. Thus in maize, the instability of the Al factor is observed only when the gene dt is presente in the homozygous conditions (RHOADES 1938). In another case, still under observation in Piracicaba, an instability is observed in Mirabilis with regard to two pairs of alleles both controlling flower color. Several cases are known, especially in corn, where recessive genes, when homozigous, affect the course of meiosis, causing asynapsis (asyndesis) (BEADLE AND MC CLINTOCK 1928, BEADLE 1930), sticky chromosomes (BEADLE 1932), supermunmerary divisions (BEADLE 1931). The most extreme case of an obscured segregatiou is represented by the action of the S factors in self stetrile plants. An additional proof of EAST AND MANGELSDORF (1925) genetic formula of self sterility has been contributed by the studies on Jinked factors in Nicotina (BRIEGER AND MANGELSDORF (1926) and Antirrhinum (BRIEGER 1930, 1935), In cases of a incomplete competition and selection between pollen tubes, studies of linked indicator-genes are indispensable in the genetic analysis, since it is impossible to analyse the factors for gametophyte competition by direct aproach. 2) The flower structure of corn is explained, and stated that the particularites of floral biology make maize an excellent object for the study of gametophyte factors. Since only one pollen tube per ovule may accomplish fertilization, the competition is always extremely strong, as compared with other species possessing multi-ovulate ovaries. The lenght of the silk permitts the study of pollen tube competitions over a varying distance. Finally the genetic analysis of grains characters (endosperm and aleoron) simpliflen the experimental work considerably, by allowing the accumulation of large numbers for statistical treatment. 3) The four methods for analyzing the naturing of pollen tube competition are discussed, following BRIEGER (1930). Of these the first three are: a) polinization with a small number of pollen grains, b) polinization at different times and c) cut- ting the style after the faster tubes have passe dand before the slower tubes have reached the point where the stigma will be cut. d) The fourth method, alteration of the distatice over which competition takes place, has been applied largely in corn. The basic conceptions underlying this process, are illustrated in Fig. 3. While BRINK (1925) and MANGELSDORF (1929) applied pollen at different levels on the silks, the remaining authors (JONES, 1922, MANGELSDORF 1929, BRIEGER, at al. 1938) have used a different process. The pollen was applied as usual, after removing the main part of the silks, but the ears were divided transversally into halves or quarters before counting. The experiments showed generally an increase in the intensity of competition when there was increase of the distance over which they had to travel. Only MANGELSDORF found an interesting exception. When the distance became extreme, the initially slower tubes seemed to become finally the faster ones. 4) Methods of genetic and statistical analysis are discussed, following chiefly BRIEGER (1937a and 1937b). A formula is given to determine the intensity of ellimination in three point experiments. 5) The few facts are cited which give some indication about the physiological mechanism of gametophyte competition. They are four in number a) the growth rate depends-only on the action of gametophyte factors; b) there is an interaction between the conductive tissue of the stigma or style and the pollen tubes, mainly in self-sterile plants; c) after self-pollination necrosis starts in the tissue of the stigma, in some orchids after F. MÜLLER (1867); d) in pollon mixtures there is an inhibitory interaction between two types of pollen and the female tissue; Gossypium according to BALLS (1911), KEARNEY 1923, 1928, KEARNEY AND HARRISON (1924). A more complete discussion is found in BRIEGER 1930). 6) A list of the gametophyte factors so far localized in corn is given. CHROMOSOME IV Ga 1 : MANGELSDORF AND JONES (1925), EMERSON 1934). Ga 4 : BRIEGER (1945b). Sp 1 : MANGELSDORF (1931), SINGLETON AND MANGELSDORF (1940), BRIEGER (1945a). CHROMOSOME V Ga 2 : BRIEGER (1937a). CHROMOSOME VI BRIEGER, TIDBURY AND TSENG (1938) found indications of a gametophyte factor altering the segregation of yellow endosperm y1. CHROMOSOME IX Ga 3 : BRIEGER, TIDBURY AND TSENG (1938). While the competition in these six cases is essentially determined by one pair of factors, the degree of elimination may be variable, as shown for Ga2 (BRIEGER, 1937), for Ga4 (BRIEGER 1945a) and for Spl (SINGLETON AND MANGELSDORF 1940, BRIEGER 1945b). The action of a gametophyte factor altering the segregation of waxy (perhaps Ga3) is increased by the presence of the sul factor which thus acts as a modifier (BRINCK AND BURNHAM 1927). A polyfactorial case of gametophyte competition has been found by JONES (1922) and analysed by DEMEREC (1929) in rice pop corn which rejects the pollen tubes of other types of corn. Preference for selfing or for brothers-sister mating and partial elimination of other pollen tubes has been described by BRIEGER (1936). 7) HARLAND'S (1943) very ingenious idea is discussed to use pollen tube factors in applied genetics in order to build up an obstacle to natural crossing as a consequence of the rapid pollen tube growth after selfing. Unfortunately, HARLAND could not obtain the experimental proof of the praticability of his idea, during his experiments on selection for minor modifiers for pollen tube grouth in cotton. In maize it should be possible to employ gametophyte factors to build up lines with preference for crossing, though the method should hardly be of any practical advantage.

Análise estatística da distribuição de Poisson

The general properties of POISSON distributions and their relations to the binomial distribuitions are discussed. Two methods of statistical analysis are dealt with in detail: X2-test. In order to carry out the X2-test, the mean frequency and the theoretical frequencies for all classes are calculated. Than the observed and the calculated frequencies are compared, using the well nown formula: f(obs) - f(esp) 2; i(esp). When the expected frequencies are small, one must not forget that the value of X2 may only be calculated, if the expected frequencies are biger than 5. If smaller values should occur, the frequencies of neighboroughing classes must ge pooled. As a second test reintroduced by BRIEGER, consists in comparing the observed and expected error standard of the series. The observed error is calculated by the general formula: δ + Σ f . VK n-1 where n represents the number of cases. The theoretical error of a POISSON series with mean frequency m is always ± Vm. These two values may be compared either by dividing the observed by the theoretical error and using BRIEGER's tables for # or by dividing the respective variances and using SNEDECOR's tables for F. The degree of freedom for the observed error is one less the number of cases studied, and that of the theoretical error is always infinite. In carrying out these tests, one important point must never be overlloked. The values for the first class, even if no concrete cases of the type were observed, must always be zero, an dthe value of the subsequent classes must be 1, 2, 3, etc.. This is easily seen in some of the classical experiments. For instance in BORKEWITZ example of accidents in Prussian armee corps, the classes are: no, one, two, etc., accidents. When counting the frequency of bacteria, these values are: no, one, two, etc., bacteria or cultures of bacteria. Ins studies of plant diseases equally the frequencies are : no, one, two, etc., plants deseased. Howewer more complicated cases may occur. For instance, when analising the degree of polyembriony, frequently the case of "no polyembryony" corresponds to the occurrence of one embryo per each seed. Thus the classes are not: no, one, etc., embryo per seed, but they are: no additional embryo, one additional embryo, etc., per seed with at least one embryo. Another interestin case was found by BRIEGER in genetic studies on the number os rows in maize. Here the minimum number is of course not: no rows, but: no additional beyond eight rows. The next class is not: nine rows, but: 10 rows, since the row number varies always in pairs of rows. Thus the value of successive classes are: no additional pair of rows beyond 8, one additional pair (or 10 rows), two additional pairs (or 12 rows) etc.. The application of the methods is finally shown on the hand of three examples : the number of seeds per fruit in the oranges M Natal" and "Coco" and in "Calamondin". As shown in the text and the tables, the agreement with a POISSON series is very satisfactory in the first two cases. In the third case BRIEGER's error test indicated a significant reduction of variability, and the X2 test showed that there were two many fruits with 4 or 5 seeds and too few with more or with less seeds. Howewer the fact that no fruit was found without seed, may be taken to indicate that in Calamondin fruits are not fully parthenocarpic and may develop only with one seed at the least. Thus a new analysis was carried out, on another class basis. As value for the first class the following value was accepted: no additional seed beyond the indispensable minimum number of one seed, and for the later classes the values were: one, two, etc., additional seeds. Using this new basis for all calculations, a complete agreement of the observed and expected frequencies, of the correspondig POISSON series was obtained, thus proving that our hypothesis of the impossibility of obtaining fruits without any seed was correct for Calamondin while the other two oranges were completely parthenocarpic and fruits without seeds did occur.

As distribuições do acaso

1) Chamamos um desvio relativo simples o quociente de um desvio, isto é, de uma diferença entre uma variável e sua média ou outro valor ideal, e o seu erro standard. D= v-v/ δ ou D = v-v2/δ Num desvio composto nós reunimos vários desvios de acordo com a equação: D = + Σ (v - 2)²: o o = o1/ o o Todo desvio relativo é caracterizado por dois graus de liberdade (número de variáveis livres) que indicam de quantas observações foi calculado o numerador (grau de liberdade nf1 ou simplesmente n2) e o denominador (grau de liberdade nf2 ou simplesmente n2). 2) Explicamos em detalhe que a chamada distribuição normal ou de OAUSS é apenas um caso especial que nós encontramos quando o erro standard do dividendo do desvio relativo é calculado de um número bem grande de observações ou determinado por uma fórmula teórica. Para provar este ponto foi demonstrado que a distribuição de GAUSS pode ser derivada da distribuição binomial quando o expoente desta torna-se igual a infinito (Fig.1). 3) Assim torna-se evidente que um estudo detalhado da variação do erro standard é necessário. Mostramos rapidamente que, depois de tentativas preliminares de LEXIS e HELMERT, a solução foi achada pelos estatísticos da escola londrina: KARL PEARSON, o autor anônimo conhecido pelo nome de STUDENT e finalmente R. A. FISHER. 4) Devemos hoje distinguir quatro tipos diferentes de dis- tribuições de acaso dos desvios relativos, em dependência de combinação dos graus de liberdade n1 e n2. Distribuição de: fisher 1 < nf1 < infinito 1 < nf2 < infinito ( formula 9-1) Pearson 1 < nf1 < infinito nf 2= infinito ( formula 3-2) Student nf2 = 1 1 < nf2= infinito ( formula 3-3) Gauss nf1 = 1 nf2= infinito ( formula 3-4) As formas das curvas (Fig. 2) e as fórmulas matemáticas dos quatro tipos de distribuição são amplamente discutidas, bem como os valores das suas constantes e de ordenadas especiais. 5) As distribuições de GAUSS e de STUDENT (Figs. 2 e 5) que correspondem a variação de desvios simples são sempre simétricas e atingem o seu máximo para a abcissa D = O, sendo o valor da ordenada correspondente igual ao valor da constante da distribuição, k1 e k2 respectivamente. 6) As distribuições de PEARSON e FISHER (Fig. 2) correspondentes à variação de desvios compostos, são descontínuas para o valor D = O, existindo sempre duas curvas isoladas, uma à direita e outra à esquerda do valor zero da abcissa. As curvas são assimétricas (Figs. 6 a 9), tornando-se mais e mais simétricas para os valores elevados dos graus de liberdade. 7) A natureza dos limites de probabilidade é discutida. Explicámos porque usam-se em geral os limites bilaterais para as distribuições de STUDENT e GAUSS e os limites unilaterais superiores para as distribuições de PEARSON e FISHER (Figs. 3 e 4). Para o cálculo dos limites deve-se então lembrar que o desvio simples, D = (v - v) : o tem o sinal positivo ou negativo, de modo que é em geral necessário determinar os limites bilaterais em ambos os lados da curva (GAUSS e STUDENT). Os desvios relativos compostos da forma D = O1 : o2 não têm sinal determinado, devendo desprezar-se os sinais. Em geral consideramos apenas o caso o1 ser maior do que o2 e os limites se determinam apenas na extremidade da curva que corresponde a valores maiores do que 1. (Limites unilaterais superiores das distribuições de PEARSON e FISHER). Quando a natureza dos dados indica a possibilidade de aparecerem tanto valores de o(maiores como menores do que o2,devemos usar os limites bilaterais, correspondendo os limites unilaterais de 5%, 1% e 0,1% de probabilidade, correspondendo a limites bilaterais de 10%, 2% e 0,2%. 8) As relações matemáticas das fórmulas das quatro distribuições são amplamente discutidas, como também a sua transformação de uma para outra quando fazemos as necessárias alterações nos graus de liberdade. Estas transformações provam matematicamente que todas as quatro distribuições de acaso formam um conjunto. Foi demonstrado matematicamente que a fórmula das distribuições de FISHER representa o caso geral de variação de acaso de um desvio relativo, se nós extendermos a sua definição desde nfl = 1 até infinito e desde nf2 = 1 até infinito. 9) Existe apenas uma distribuição de GAUSS; podemos calcular uma curva para cada combinação imaginável de graus de liberdade para as outras três distribuições. Porém, é matematicamente evidente que nos aproximamos a distribuições limitantes quando os valores dos graus de liberdade se aproximam ao valor infinito. Partindo de fórmulas com área unidade e usando o erro standard como unidade da abcissa, chegamos às seguintes transformações: a) A distribuição de STUDENT (Fig. 5) passa a distribuição de GAUSS quando o grau de liberdade n2 se aproxima ao valor infinito. Como aproximação ao infinito, suficiente na prática, podemos aceitar valores maiores do que n2 = 30. b) A distribuição de PEARSON (Fig. 6) passa para uma de GAUSS com média zero e erro standard unidade quando nl é igual a 1. Quando de outro lado, nl torna-se muito grande, a distribuição de PEARSON podia ser substituída por uma distribuição modificada de GAUSS, com média igual ale unidade da abcissa igual a 1 : V2 n 1 . Para fins práticos, valores de nl maiores do que 30 são em geral uma aproximação suficiente ao infinito. c) Os limites da distribuição de FISHER são um pouco mais difíceis para definir. I) Em primeiro lugar foram estudadas as distribuições com n1 = n2 = n e verificamos (Figs. 7 e 8) que aproximamo-nos a uma distribuição, transformada de GAUSS com média 1 e erro standard l : Vn, quando o valor cresce até o infinito. Como aproximação satisfatória podemos considerar nl = n2 = 100, ou já nl =r n2 - 50 (Fig. 8) II) Quando n1 e n2 diferem (Fig. 9) podemos distinguir dois casos: Se n1 é pequeno e n2 maior do que 100 podemos substituir a distribuição de FISHER pela distribuição correspondente de PEARSON. (Fig. 9, parte superior). Se porém n1é maior do que 50 e n2 maior do que 100, ou vice-versa, atingimos uma distribuição modificada de GAUSS com média 1 e erro standard 1: 2n1 n3 n1 + n2 10) As definições matemáticas e os limites de probabilidade para as diferentes distribuições de acaso são dadas em geral na literatura em formas bem diversas, usando-se diferentes sistemas de abcissas. Com referência às distribuições de FISHER, foi usado por este autor, inicialmente, o logarítmo natural do desvio relativo, como abcissa. SNEDECOR (1937) emprega o quadrado dos desvios relativos e BRIEGER (1937) o desvio relativo próprio. As distribuições de PEARSON são empregadas para o X2 teste de PEARSON e FISHER, usando como abcissa os valores de x² = D². n1 Foi exposto o meu ponto de vista, que estas desigualdades trazem desvantagens na aplicação dos testes, pois atribui-se um peso diferente aos números analisados em cada teste, que são somas de desvios quadrados no X2 teste, somas des desvios quadrados divididos pelo grau de liberdade ou varianças no F-teste de SNEDECOR, desvios simples no t-teste de STUDENT, etc.. Uma tábua dos limites de probabilidade de desvios relativos foi publicada por mim (BRIEGER 1937) e uma tábua mais extensa será publicada em breve, contendo os limites unilaterais e bilaterais, tanto para as distribuições de STUDENT como de FISHER. 11) Num capítulo final são discutidas várias complicações que podem surgir na análise. Entre elas quero apenas citar alguns problemas. a) Quando comparamos o desvio de um valor e sua média, deveríamos corretamente empregar também os erros de ambos estes valores: D = u- u o2 +²5 Mas não podemos aqui imediatamente aplicar os limites de qualquer das distribuições do acaso discutidas acima. Em geral a variação de v, medida por o , segue uma distribuição de STUDENT e a variação da média V segue uma distribuição de GAUSS. O problema a ser solucionado é, como reunir os limites destas distribuições num só teste. A solução prática do caso é de considerar a média como uma constante, e aplicar diretamente os limites de probabilidade das dstribuições de STUDENT com o grau de liberdade do erro o. Mas este é apenas uma solução prática. O problema mesmo é, em parte, solucionado pelo teste de BEHRENDS. b) Um outro problema se apresenta no curso dos métodos chamados "analysis of variance" ou decomposição do erro. Supomos que nós queremos comparar uma média parcial va com a média geral v . Mas podemos calcular o erro desta média parcial, por dois processos, ou partindo do erro individual aa ou do erro "dentro" oD que é, como explicado acima, uma média balançada de todos os m erros individuais. O emprego deste último garante um teste mais satisfatório e severo, pois êle é baseado sempre num grau de liberdade bastante elevado. Teremos que aplicar dois testes em seguida: Em primeiro lugar devemos decidir se o erro ou difere do êrro dentro: D = δa/δ0 n1 = np/n2 m. n p Se este teste for significante, uma substituição de oa pelo oD não será admissível. Mas mesmo quando o resultado for insignificante, ainda não temos certeza sobre a identidade dos dois erros, pois pode ser que a diferença entre eles é pequena e os graus de liberdade não são suficientes para permitir o reconhecimento desta diferença como significante. Podemos então substituirmos oa por oD de modo que n2 = m : np: D = V a - v / δa Np n = 1 n2 = np passa para D = v = - v/ δ Np n = 1 n2 = m.n p as como podemos incluir neste último teste uma apreciação das nossas dúvidas sobre o teste anterior oa: oD ? A melhor solução prática me parece fazer uso da determinação de oD, que é provavelmente mais exata do que oa, mas usar os graus de liberdade do teste simples: np = 1 / n2 = np para deixar margem para as nossas dúvidas sobre a igualdade de oa a oD. Estes dois exemplos devem ser suficientes para demonstrar que apesar dos grandes progressos que nós podíamos registrar na teoria da variação do acaso, ainda existem problemas importantes a serem solucionados.

Efeitos do arsênico sôbre a cultura do algodoeiro em terra arenosa

The authors studied the action of arsenic, in the form of lead arsenate and sodium arsenite, on cotton in white sandy soil of Piracicaba, State of S. Paulo, Brazil. The experiment was carried out in Mitscherlich pots, applying increasing quantities of the above mentioned compounds. The following conclusions were reached: sodium arsenite is more toxic than lead arsenate. 48 pounds per acre of lead arsenate and 16 pounds per acre of sodium arsenite reduced the vegetative development and the production of cotton. The roots were more seriously affected than the aerial parts. Sandy soils were sensitive to arsenic toxicity. The arsenic mobilization in the soil seems to depend upon factors such as, the a- cidity, the concentration of Fe2O3, CaO, P2O5 and soil colloids, both clay and humus components. The authors suggest, based on their own experiment and after a detailed study of the literature, the use of organic insecticids which may not leave toxic residues, rotation of crops, application of lime and reduction of arsenical sprays to a mini mum. Arsenic compounds should not be used in soils destined to the cultivation of food plants. Rice should not be planted in soils contaminated by arsenic compounds during several years of cotton cultivation. Future experiments are planed, using other soils such as "terra roxa", in Mitscherlich pots and in field plots.

Espiguetas de dois grãos no milho

A morfologia, ocorrência, utilidade e genética das flores funcionais inferiores em espiguetas de milho, são examinadas ligeiramente. Em regra, somente a flor superior em cada espigueta numa espiga de milho se desenvolve e contém um grão, porém nos exemplos em foco a flor inferior se desenvolve tão bem como a superior. O embrião no milho geralmente se acha voltado na mesma direção que a ponta da espiga, ao passo que o embrião do grão proveniente da flor inferior se volta na direção da base. São raras, não só na América do Norte e Central, como na maior parte da América do Sul, as espigas nas quais os grãos provêm da flor inferior das espiguetas, constituindo uma exceção o milho doce Country Gentleman, no qual se encontram grãos em ambas as flores na maioria das espiguetas. No Brasil e na Bolívia, entretanto, são mais comuns as espigas com espiguetas de dois grãos. Sendo o milho proveniente da América do Sul, é de esperar-se que se encontrem mais variedades e tipos mais primitivos próximo do centro de origem. No milho Pipoca Pontudo Paulista, o Dr. BRIEGER encontrou espigas com ambas as flores funcionais em algumas espiguetas. Em alguns casos, ambos os grãos eram de tamanho normal, porém, mais comumente, um dos dois grãos era bem menor que o outro. Em espigas encontradas pelo Dr. MARTIN CARDENAS, algumas espiguetas apresentam grãos provindos somente das flores inferiores, uma circunstância característica do grupo "Poaceae", e não do "Panicaceae" a que pertence o milho. Muitos gens que influenciam os característicos do pendão, também influenciam os das espigas. Alguns destes controlam a formação de grãos na flor inferior da espigueta-fêmea. A maioria dos gens conhecidos como afetando as espiguetas inferiores, são recessivos, tal como no caso das espigas brasileira e boliviana estudadas, e no Country Gentleman. Um exemplo de espiguetas gêmeas foi encontrado entre o material tunicata do Dr. BRIEGER. Aí, em vez de uma só espi-gueta, o que é o normal, havia duas espiguetas completas, simétricas, sendo uma em posição oposta ao normal. Os grãos, em ambas, achavam-se na flor superior. Prosseguem os estudos sobre a espigueta do milho. O Dr. GONÇALVES DRUMOND, da Escola Superior de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, encontrou recentemente algumas espigas de "Cateto", nas quais a flor inferior é funcional e está estudando as mesmas. Parece que o mais interessante material para os novos estudos é o que o Dr. BRIEGER encontrou no seu milho "Pipoca Pontudo Paulista, pois há ai graus variáveis de desenvolvimento tanto superiores como inferiores.

Gramados para parques avícolas: nota prévia

Na Seção de Avicultura da Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", da Universidade de São Paulo, foi iniciada uma experiência de pastagens para galinhas, para determinação das espécies mais adequadas ao fim visado. Os resultados obtidos neste primeiro ano de experiência indicaram a seguinte classificação: 1.o - Consociação de Grama Seda (Cynodon dactylon Pers.) var.? com Capim Quicúio (Pennisetum clandestinum Chiov.). 2.0 - Grama Seda (Cynodon dactylon Pers.) var.? 3.0 - Capim Quicúio (Pennisetum clandestinum Chiov.). 4.O - Grama de Batatais (Palpalum notatum Flügge.). 5.o - Uma grama ainda não determinada. 6.o - Grama Paulista (Cynodon dactylon Pers.) var.? A variedade Gigante de Cynodon dactylon Pers. não deu resultados satisfatórios. A experiência será continuada.

Comportamento dos cromossômios na meiose de Euryophthalmus rufipennis Laporte (Hemiptera Pyrrhocoridae)

In this paper an account is given of the principal facts observer in the meiosis of Euryophthalmus rufipennis Laporte which afford some evidence in favour of the view held by the present writer in earlier publications regarding the existence of two terminal kinetochores in Hem ip ter an chromosomes as well as the transverse division of the chromosomes. Spermatogonial mitosis - From the beginning of prophase until metaphase nothing worthy of special reference was observed. At anaphase, on the contrary, the behavior of the chromosomes deserves our best attention. Indeed, the chromoso- mes, as soon as they begin to move, they show both ends pronouncedly turned toward the poles to which they are connected by chromosomal fibres. So a premature and remarkable bending of the chromosomes not yet found in any other species of Hemiptera and even of Homoptera points strongly to terminally localized kinetochores. The explanation proposed by HUGHES-SCHRADER and RIS for Nautococcus and by RIS for Tamalia, whose chromosomes first become bent late in anaphase do not apply to chromosomes which initiate anaphase movement already turned toward the corresponding pole. In the other hand, the variety of positions assumed by the anaphase chromosomes of Euryophthalmus with regard to one another speaks conclusively against the idea of diffuse spindle attachments. First meiotic division - Corresponding to the beginning of the story of the primary spermatocytes cells are found with the nucleus entirelly filled with leptonema threads. Nuclei with thin and thick threads have been considered as being in the zygotente phase. At the pachytene stage the bivalents are formed by two parallel strands clearly separated by a narrow space. The preceding phases differ in nothing from the corresponding orthodox ones, pairing being undoubtedly of the parasynaptic type. Formation of tetrads - When the nuclei coming from the diffuse stage can be again understood the chromosomes reappear as thick threads formed by two filaments intimately united except for a short median segment. Becoming progressively shorter and thicker the bivalents sometimes unite their extremities forming ring-shaped figures. Generally, however, this does not happen and the bivalents give origin to more or less condensed characteristic Hemipteran tetrads, bent at the weak median region. The lateral duplicity of the tetrads is evident. At metaphase the tetrads are still bent and are connected with both poles by their ends. The ring-shaped diakinesis tetrads open themselves out before metaphase, showing in this way that were not chiasmata that held their ends together. Anaphase proceeds as expected. If we consider the median region of the tetrads as being terminalized chiasmata, then the chromosomes are provided with a single terminal kinetochore. But this it not the case. A critical analysis of the story of the bivalents before and after the diffuse stage points to the conclusion that they are continuous throughout their whole length. Thence the chromosomes are considered as having a kinetochore at each end. Orientation - There are some evidences that Hemipteran chromosomes are connected by chiasmata. If this is true, the orientation of the tetrads may be understood in the following manner: Chiasmata being hindered to scape by the terminal kinetochores accumulate at the ends of the tetrads, where condensation begins. Repulsion at the centric ends being prevented by chiasmata the tetrads orient themselves as if they were provided with a single kinetochore at each extremity, taking a position parallelly to the spindle axis. Anaphase separation - Anaphase separation is consequently due to a transverse division of the chromosomes. Telophase and secund meiotic division - At telophase the kinetochore repeli one another following the moving apart of the centosomes, the chiasmata slip toward the acentric extremities and the chromosomes rotate in order to arrange themselves parallelly to the axis of the new spindle. Separation is therefore throughout the pairing plane. Origin of the dicentricity of the chromosomes - Dicentricity of the chromosomes is ascribed to the division of the kinetochore of the chromosomes reaching the poles followed by separation and distension of the chromatids which remain fused at the acentric ends giving thus origin to terminally dicentric iso-chromosomes. Thence, the transverse division of the chromosomes, that is, a division through a plane perpendicular to the plane of pairing, actually corresponds to a longitudinal division realized in the preceding generation. Inactive and active kinetochores - Chromosomes carrying inactive kinetochore is not capable of orientation and active anaphasic movements. The heterochromosome of Diactor bilineatus in the division of the secondary spermatocytes is justly in this case, standing without fibrilar connection with the poles anywhere in the cell, while the autosomes are moving regularly. The heterochromosome of Euryophthalmus, on the contrary, having its kinetochores perfectly active ,is correctly oriented in the plane of the equator together with the autosomes and shows terminal chromosomal connection with both poles. Being attracted with equal strength by two opposite poles it cannot decide to the one way or the other remaining motionless in the equator until some secondary causes (as for instances a slight functional difference between the kinetochores) intervene to break the state of equilibrium. When Yiothing interferes to aide the heterochromosome in choosing its way it distends itself between the autosomal plates forming a fusiform bridge which sometimes finishes by being broken. Ordinarily, however, the bulky part of the heterochromosome passes to one pole. Spindle fibers and kinetic activity of chromosomal fragments - The kinetochore is considered as the unique part of the chromosome capable of being influenced by other kinetochore or by the poles. Under such influence the kinetochore would be stimulated or activited and would elaborate a sort of impulse which would run toward the ends. In this respect the chromosome may be compared to a neüròn, the cell being represented by the kinetochore and the axon by the body of the chromosome. Due to the action of the kinetochore the entire chromosome becomes also activated for performing its kinetic function. Nothing is known at present about the nature of this activation. We can however assume that some active chemical substance like those produced by the neuron and transferred to the effector passes from the kinetochore to the body of the chromosome runing down to the ends. And, like an axon which continues to transmit an impulse after the stimulating agent has suspended its action, so may the chromosome show some residual kinetic activity even after having lost its kinetochore. This is another explanation for the kinetic behavior of acentric chromosomal fragmehs. In the orthodox monocentric chromosomes the kinetic activity is greater at the kinetochore, that is, at the place of origin of the active substance than at any other place. In chromosomes provided with a kinetochore at each end the entire body may become active enough to produce chromosomal fibers. This is probably due to a more or less uniform distribution and concentration of the active substance coming simultaneously from both extremities of the chromosome.

Notas sôbre a meiose de pachylis (Hemipt-Coreidae)

Spermatogonial chromosomes of Pachylis laticornis and Pachylis pharaonis begin anaphasic movement with both ends turned toward the same pole, maintaining this form util they reach the poles. This is a proof that they are provided with one kinetochore at each end. Additional proof for a longitudinal division of each longitudinal half of the anaphase chromosomes of the primary sper- matocytes is presented against the idea of a previous end-toend pairing at metaphase. The longitudinal split of the chromosomes of the secondary spermatocytes which used to be considered as tertiary split is therefore a true secondary split. The heterochromosome in both species passes undivided to one pole in the first division of the spermatocyte. In Pachylis laticornis it appears connected with the poles by means of two fibrils detached from each extremity, what may be considered as indicating a rather premature longitudinal spliting. The behavior of the heterochromosome of Pachylis pharaonis is highly interesting and affords one of the most beautiful evidences in favour of the dicentricity of the chromosomes. Really, in metaphase the heterochromosome appears at the equator of the cell with a more or less round shape. In the beginning of anaphase it becomes fusiform. As anaphase proceeds it distends itself between the autosomal plates forming a long fusiform bridge or sends toward the plates a thick chromosomal thread. The bulky part of the heterochromosome as it passes to one side it reincorporates the substance of the thread in this side. The thread in the other side, which becomes generally thiner, is left with its kinetochore in the cell at this side. The heterochromosome therefore becomes terminally monocentric in the first division of the spermatocyte. Some figures, however, suggest that the heterochromossome from time to time may pass with both kinetochores to one of the cells, as ordinarily happens in the case of Pachylis laticornis. Summing up, other things apart the behavior of the heterochromosome in both species studied here puts out of doubt the question of the existence of two terminally located kinetochores.