Fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a comparative study

PURPOSE: To assess fatigue and quality of life in disease-free breast cancer survivors in relation to a sample of age-matched women with no cancer history and to explore the relationship between fatigue and quality of life.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 202 consecutive disease-free Brazilian breast cancer survivors, all of whom had completed treatment, treated at 2 large hospitals. The patients were compared to age-matched women with no cancer history attending a primary health care center. The Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) were used to measure the fatigue and quality of life, respectively. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were also obtained. The χ2 test, generalized linear model, and Spearman correlation coefficient were used for statistical purposes. The adopted level of significance was 5%.RESULTS: Breast cancer survivors experienced significantly greater total and subscale fatigue scores than comparison group (all p-values<0.05). In addition, survivors reported a poorer quality of life in physical (p=0.002), psychological (p=0.03), and social relationships (p=0.03) domains than comparison group. No difference was found for the environmental domain (p=0.08) for both groups. For survivors of breast cancer and for comparison group, the total and subscale fatigue scores were related to lower quality of life (all p-values<0.01).CONCLUSION: The findings of this study highlight the importance of assessing fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Tradução, adaptação e validação da versão brasileira do questionário Utian Quality of Life para avaliação da qualidade de vida no climatério

OBJETIVOTraduzir, realizar a equivalência e validar o questionário Utian Quality of Life(UQOL) para a população brasileira.MÉTODOSParticiparam do estudo mulheres selecionadas aleatoriamente, na fase do climatério, residentes na cidade de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, localizada na região do nordeste brasileiro. Foram utilizados os questionários UQOL e SF-36, sendo a fase da tradução realizada da língua inglesa para o português por três professores, enquanto que a fase de adaptação da versão traduzida foi feita através da aplicação do questionário a 35 mulheres, que poderiam marcar a opção de resposta "não compreendi a questão"; e para a validação foram usadas as medidas de reprodutibilidade (teste-reteste) e validade de construto, seguindo as normas metodológicas padronizadas internacionalmenteRESULTADOSA versão brasileira foi reconhecida plenamente pela população-alvo, que foi composta por 151 mulheres, devido a nenhuma questão apresentar percentual de "não compreensão" igual ou superior a 20%. Os resultados obtidos para a reprodutibilidade intra e interobservador demonstraram concordância significativa em todos os itens do questionário. Essa versão apresentou consistência acima do critério requerido (>70), demonstrando sua precisão, enquanto que a validade de construto foi obtida através de correlações estatisticamente significativas entre os domínios ocupação, saúde e emocional do UQOL com os domínios do SF-36. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach para o instrumento como um todo foi de 0,82, representando boa precisão. Análise da correlação item-total demonstrou a homogeneidade da escala.CONCLUSÃOA partir das etapas realizadas, o questionário UQOL foi traduzido e adaptado para aplicação no Brasil, apresentando alta reprodutibilidade e validade. Dessa forma, pode ser incluído e utilizado em estudos brasileiros que visem avaliar a qualidade de vida durante a peri e pós-menopausa.

Dyadic Relationship and Quality of Life Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

AbstractIintroduction:Chronic Renal insufficiency (CRI) and dialysis treatment lead to a succession of situations for kidney chronic patient, which compromises his aspect, not only physically, and psychologically, with personal, family and social repercussions.Objective:(1) to verify the existence of differences of dyadic adjustment (DA) according to renal replacement treatment (RRT) and (2) verify the existence of differences quality of life (QOL) in accordance with the RRT.Methods:This is a cross-sectional study of a descriptive nature through surveys, exploratory and correlational. The sample consisted of 125 participants. Of these, 31 were to be made RRT by automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and 94 hemodialysis (HD). Participants were selected from three renal centers: (1) Centro Renal da Prelada (Porto, Portugal), (2) Centrodial (S. João da Madeira, Portugal) and Centro Renal da Misericórdia de Paredes (Paredes, Portugal). The study was carried out for 6 months. The following instruments were applied: Socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire (SDCQ), Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref).Results:The results demonstrate the existence of statistically significant differences between the type of RRT and most areas of QOL, as well as the existence of statistically significant differences between the subscales of the DAS evaluated and the type of RRT.Conclusion:The present study demonstrates a greater commitment in terms of QOL of individuals undergoing treatment for HD when compared with those subjected to APD. It turns out, also, that DA is most strongly perceived by patients in APD than with HD.