Qualidade do solo avaliada pelo "Soil Quality Kit Test" em dois experimentos de longa duração no Rio Grande do Sul

A avaliação da qualidade do solo (QS) é importante estratégia no planejamento agrícola, possibilitando a identificação e o aprimoramento de sistemas de manejo com características de alta produtividade e de preservação ambiental. O presente estudo foi realizado em dois experimentos de longa duração (10 e 15 anos) conduzidos no Sul do Brasil e teve por objetivo avaliar o efeito de sistemas de manejo na QS, utilizando um kit de análise expedita de qualidade de solo (KQS), desenvolvido pelo Instituto de Qualidade do Solo-USDA-ARS. A eficiência desse kit foi avaliada pela comparação com os métodos tradicionais utilizados na ciência do solo. Nas duas áreas experimentais investigou-se um total de 12 tratamentos, os quais englobaram sistemas de preparo com diferentes intensidades de revolvimento do solo (preparo convencional, preparo reduzido e plantio direto) e sistemas de culturas com ampla faixa de adição de resíduos vegetais ao solo, além da aplicação de doses anuais de N-uréia, variando de 0 a 144 kg ha-1. Em cada base experimental uma área sob campo natural foi avaliada, servindo como referência da condição do solo na ausência de interferência antrópica. Como indicadores de QS, foram avaliados infiltração de água, respiração do solo, densidade do solo, teor de nitrato+nitrito (N-NO3- + N-NO2-), estabilidade de agregados em água e pH. De maneira geral, os coeficientes de correlação entre os métodos do KQS e os métodos tradicionais foram elevados, sendo o mais alto para o indicador pH (r = 0,98) e o menor para o indicador infiltração de água no solo (r = 0,42). Os tratamentos selecionados foram teoricamente ordenados em ordem crescente de QS, a qual foi reproduzida de forma eficiente pelo índice de estoque de carbono (IEC), calculado pela razão entre o estoque de C orgânico do solo, na camada de 0-5 cm, de cada tratamento e o estoque de C orgânico no solo sob campo natural. Os indicadores estabilidade de agregados, N-NO3- + N-NO2- e respiração do solo foram os mais eficientes em discriminar a QS. O KQS foi eficiente em avaliar a QS dos tratamentos nas duas áreas experimentais. Os níveis mais elevados de QS foram alcançados nos tratamentos com plantio direto e consórcio de gramíneas e leguminosas tropicais, devido à cobertura do solo e às elevadas adições de C e N via resíduos culturais.

Pedotransfer functions to estimate proctor test parameters under different tillage systems

The Proctor test is time-consuming and requires sampling of several kilograms of soil. Proctor test parameters were predicted in Mollisols, Entisols and Vertisols of the Pampean region of Argentina under different management systems. They were estimated from a minimum number of readily available soil properties (soil texture, total organic C) and management (training data set; n = 73). The results were used to generate a soil compaction susceptibility model, which was subsequently validated using a second group of independent data (test data set; n = 24). Soil maximum bulk density was estimated as follows: Maximum bulk density (Mg m-3) = 1.4756 - 0.00599 total organic C (g kg-1) + 0.0000275 sand (g kg-1) + 0.0539 management. Management was equal to 0 for uncropped and untilled soils and 1 for conventionally tilled soils. The established models predicted the Proctor test parameters reasonably well, based on readily available soil properties. Tillage systems induced changes in the maximum bulk density regardless of total organic matter content or soil texture. The lower maximum apparent bulk density values under no-tillage require a revision of the relative compaction thresholds for different no-tillage crops.

Portable penetrometer for agricultural soil: sensitivity test to identify critical compaction depth

To express the negative effects of soil compaction, some researchers use critical values for soil mechanical strength that severely impair plant growth. The aim of this study was to identify this critical compaction depth, to test the functionality of a new, portable penetrometer developed from a spring dynamometer, and compare it to an electronic penetrometer traditionally used in compaction studies of agricultural soils. Three soils with distinct texture were conventionally tilled using a disk plow, and cultivated with different plant species. The critical soil resistance defined to establish critical compaction depth was equal to 1.5 MPa. The results of the new equipment were similar to the electronic penetrometer, indicating its viability as a tool for assessing the soil physical conditions for plant growth.

Chemical dispersants and pre-treatments to determine clay in soils with different mineralogy

Knowledge of the soil physical properties, including the clay content, is of utmost importance for agriculture. The behavior of apparently similar soils can differ in intrinsic characteristics determined by different formation processes and nature of the parent material. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of separate or combined pre-treatments, dispersion methods and chemical dispersant agents to determine clay in some soil classes, selected according to their mineralogy. Two Brazilian Oxisols, two Alfisols and one Mollisol with contrasting mineralogy were selected. Different treatments were applied: chemical substances as dispersants (lithium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, and hexametaphosphate); pre-treatment with dithionite, ammonium oxalate, and hydrogen peroxide to eliminate organic matter; and coarse sand as abrasive and ultrasound, to test their mechanical action. The conclusion was drawn that different treatments must be applied to determine clay, in view of the soil mineralogy. Lithium hydroxide was not efficient to disperse low-CEC electropositive soils and very efficient in dispersing high-CEC electronegative soils. The use of coarse sand as an abrasive increased the clay content of all soils and in all treatments in which dispersion occurred, with or without the use of chemical dispersants. The efficiency of coarse sand is not the same for all soil classes.