1 resultado para stars: kinematics and dynamics
em Bioline International
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (17)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (16)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (26)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (22)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (13)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (30)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (47)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (56)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (11)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (31)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (10)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (22)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (113)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (18)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (83)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (70)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (7)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (28)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (9)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (22)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Organic farming does not allow using certain inputs, such as N, which differ in nutrient release rates and dynamics. To evaluate the effect of different organic fertilizers on the vegetative, nutritional, and productive parameters of blueberries ( Vaccinium corymbosum L.), a pot experiment was conducted in three consecutive seasons in a sandy soil of south-central Chile using ‘Corona’, ‘Legacy’ and ‘Liberty’. The following fertilizers were evaluated: compost (CM), Purely Grow (PG), Purely Lysine (PL), Fertil (F), blood meal (BM), lupine meal (LM), along with a control treatment without fertilization (C) and two conventional treatments with urea (CF) and sodium nitrate (S). Results indicate that vegetative growth and leaf N concentration prior to senescence were different among cultivars in the three evaluated seasons. The highest leaf N concentration was recorded in ‘Corona’ followed by ‘Legacy’ and ‘Liberty’ while levels tended to increase in the seasons. Quick-release N sources had greater effects on these parameters but with differences among cultivars. Fruit yield and weight were higher in ‘Corona’ followed by ‘Legacy’ and ‘Liberty’. Fruit yield was generally higher when using LM and F and showed no effect on fruit weight. Leaf chlorophyll content was higher in ‘Corona’ followed by ‘Legacy’ and ‘Liberty’, which increased when using CF, LM, BM, and PG. Finally, the organic fertilizer and blueberry cultivar that obtained the highest values for most of the evaluated parameters were LM and Corona, respectively.