1 resultado para self-control
em Bioline International
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (7)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (120)
- Boston University Digital Common (9)
- Brock University, Canada (26)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (26)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (44)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (22)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (29)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (16)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (27)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (8)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (41)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (135)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (60)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (25)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Objective: To investigate the knowledge and use of asthma control measurement (ACM) tools in the management of asthma among doctors working in family and internal medicine practice in Nigeria. Method: A questionnaire based on the global initiative on asthma (GINA) guideline was self-administered by 194 doctors. It contains 12 test items on knowledge of ACM tools and its application. The knowledge score was obtained by adding the correct answers and classified as good if the score ≥ 9, satisfactory if score was 6-8 and poor if < 6. Results: The overall doctors knowledge score of ACM tools was 4.49±2.14 (maximum of 12). Pulmonologists recorded the highest knowledge score of 10.75±1.85. The majority (69.6%) had poor knowledge score of ACM tools. Fifty (25.8%) assessed their patients’ level of asthma control and 34(17.5%) at every visit. Thirty-nine (20.1%) used ACM tools in their consultation, 29 (15.0%) of them used GINA defined control while 10 (5.2 %) used asthma control test (ACT). The use of the tools was associated with pulmonologists, having attended CME within six months and graduated within five years prior to the survey. Conclusion: The results highlight the poor knowledge and use of ACM tools and the need to address the knowledge gap.