Development of paclitaxel-loaded liposomal systems with anti-her2 antibody for targeted therapy

Purpose: To develop liposome formulations containing monoclonal antibody anti-HER2 (MabHer2), and Paclitaxel (PTX). Methods: Seven different liposomal systems containing PTX, or MabHer2 or a combination of PTX and MabHer2 were made using lipid film hydration technique and sonication. The effects of liposome preparation conditions and extraction methods on antibody structure were investigated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The characteristics of the liposomes were determined by a zetasizer, while drug-loading efficiency was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography. The cytotoxic effect of the liposome formulations was evaluated on MDA-MB-453 (HER2+) and MCF-7 (HER2-) breast cancer cell lines by MTT assay. Results: The antibody was not significantly affected by the stress conditions and the method of extraction. The particle size of liposomes was < 200 nm while the amount of incorporated PTX was 97.6 % for liposome without cationic agent and 98.2 % for those with cationic agent. Recovery of MabHer2 was 94.38 % after extraction. Combined PTX/MabHer2 liposome was more toxic on HER2 overexpressing positive MDA-MB-453 cell line than PTX-loaded liposomes and MabHer2. MabHer2 and combined PTX/MabHer2 liposomes showed no toxic effects on HER2 overexpressing negative MCF-7 cells relative to cationic PTX-loaded liposomes. Conclusions: This results obtained show that PTX can be encapsulated successfully into liposoma systems and that owing to Her2 specific antibody, these systems can be delivered directly to the target cell.

Clinical efficacy of paclitaxel in the treatment of mid-stage and advanced malignant gastric cancer, and effect of nursing interventions

Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel combined with additional chemotherapy for mid-stage and advanced malignant tumors, and the benefits afforded by scientific nursing. Methods: Patients with mid-stage and advanced gastric cancer were randomly divided into test and control groups. Control group was given intravenous chemotherapy (400 mg/m2 fluorouracil and 2500 mg/m2 cisplatin) and nursed conventionally, while the test group was additionally treated with 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel and underwent special scientific nursing. Clinical effects and changes in the rates of apoptosis and cell proliferation were recorded. The effect of applying scientific nursing on therapeutic outcomes was also evaluated. Results: The overall rate of treatment effectiveness, clinical control rate, mean apoptosis and proliferation rates in the test group were 56.40, 92.30, (7.10 ± 3.17 and 28.70 ± 3.22 %, respectively, while, in the control group, the values were 38.50, 64.10, 25.40 ± 2.67 and 32.60 ± 2.93 %, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). In terms of nursing efficacy, the test group had a lower pain score and higher quality-of-life scores (Karnofsky performance status score) than control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Paclitaxel has a significant effect when used to treat mid-stage and advanced gastric cancer. Moreover, additional nursing not only enhances the therapeutic effect but also improves prognosis and quality-of-life.