Association of follicle stimulating hormone receptor promoter with ovarian response in IVF-ET patients

Background: Poor ovarian response phenomenon has been observed in some of the in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Some investigations found that follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene plays a role in the process, but no direct evidence shows the correlation between genotypes of FSHR and ovarian response. Objective: Exploring the molecular mechanism behind the mutation of FSHR promoter association with ovarian granulosa cells and poor ovarian response. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was performed using 158 women undergoing the controlled short program ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment. The 263 bp DNA fragments before the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor 5' initiation site were sequenced in the patients under IVF cycle, 70 of which had poor ovarian response and 88 showed normal ovarian responses. Results: With a mutation rate of 40%, 63 in 158 cases showed a 29th site G→A point mutation; among the mutated cases, the mutation rate of the poor ovarian responders was significantly higher than the normal group (60% versus 23.9%; χ2=21.450, p<0.001). Besides, the variability was also obvious in antral follicle count, and ovum pick-ups. The estradiol peak values and the number of mature eggs between the two groups had significant difference. However, there was no obvious variability (t=0.457, p=0.324) in the basic FSH values between the two groups (normal group, 7.2±2.3 U/L; mutation group, 7.1±2.0 U/L). Conclusion: The activity of FSHR promoter is significantly affected by the 29th site G→A mutation that will weaken promoter activity and result in poor response to FSH.

Antiviral activity and mechanism of action of arbidol against Hantaan virus infection

Purpose: To investigate the activity and mechanism of action of arbidol against Hantaan virus (HTNV) activity by modulating inflammation via TLR-4 pathway. Methods: HUVEC cells infected with HTNV 76-118 were treated with serially diluted arbidol solutions at -2h (2 h before viral infection, pre-treatment mode), 0 h (at the same time as viral infection, simultaneous treatment mode) or 2 h (2 h after viral infection, post-treatment mode). The transcript levels of TLR4 were detected by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h later. The levels of iNOS and TNF-α were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Pre-treatment with arbidol, rather than simultaneous treatment or post-treatment, effectively inhibited up-regulation of cellular TLR4 expression (up to 40 ± 6.1 % inhibition) and activity of supernatant iNOS induced by HTNV infection(up to 44.1 ± 9.4 % inhibition), as well as in a LPSstimulated inflammatory endothelial cell. Arbidol decreased the elevated TNF-α levels induced by LPS stimulation. Conclusion: These results are the first evidence that arbidol modulates viral PRRs signaling and its consequential inflammatory cytokine/chemokine response during hantavirus infection.