1 resultado para Quality of evidence in judicial
em Bioline International
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (30)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (66)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (63)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (18)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (5)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (25)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (16)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (154)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (163)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (35)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (15)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (4)
Resumo:
Objectives This study was an in-vitro evaluation of different brands of paracetamol and cotrimoxazole tablets, used or found in Malawi, based on Pharmacopoeia standards, in order to ascertain the existence and extent of substandard medicines in Malawi and to give an overview of their distribution in the public and private sectors. Methodology A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using 11 samples each of paracetamol and cotrimoxazole tablets. Stratified random sampling was used to collect samples. Samples were analyzed using HPLC and Spectrophometric methods as outlined in the BP-2007 and USP-32 at the National Drug Quality Control Laboratory (NDQCL)-Lilongwe (under Pharmacy Medicines and Poisons Board-PMPB) and Orient Pharma Co. Ltd of Taiwan. The results were analyzed using Epi Info. Results and discussion Fifty percent of samples (n=22) were not registered in the country by the PMPB as required by the PMP Act with the majority of those coming from public health facilities. All paracetamol and cotrimoxazole samples complied with identification tests using spectrophotometric and HPLC method. Overall, 27.3% of samples failed to meet the BP-2007 standards for Active Ingredient content, while 22.7% of the samples failed the Friability test. The results from Malawi are similar in magnitude to those within surrounding countries in Africa. Conclusion This pilot study provides objective evidence to show that substandard and unregistered paracetamol and cotrimoxazole are present and being used in Malawi, and thus posing a considerable hazard to public health in Malawi. PMPB, together with the Ministry of Health, must continue to develop a quality assurance system to ensure that medicines are randomly and routinely checked.