1 resultado para Psychosocial expertise
em Bioline International
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Argos - Repositorio Institucional de la Secretaría de Investigación y Postgrado de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Misiones (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (58)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (78)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (9)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (18)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (13)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- E-Research at Tennessee State University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (5)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (8)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (21)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (29)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (5)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (31)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (14)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (9)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (14)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (12)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (43)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (34)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidade do Minho (34)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (5)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (119)
- Université de Montréal (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (19)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (86)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Purpose: To explore the influence of pharmacist factors on prescription decisions of physicians. Methods: A survey of literature was carried out across online databases and 12 relevant articles were identified. The influence of pharmacist factors on physician prescription decisions was identified in the articles. A conceptual model for investigating pharmacist factors that influence physicians’ prescription decisions was then developed. Results: The main factors identified were pharmacist expertise, pharmacist – physician collaboration, and trust between physician and pharmacist. There was no direct evidence of influence of pharmacist expertise on prescription, but some studies indicated that pharmacist recommendation is in tandem with the prescribing behaviour of physicians. One study reported that pharmacist–physician collaboration positively influenced physicians’ prescribing decision, while others found no relationship between these. Conclusion: Existing literature on the influence of pharmacist factors on prescription behaviour of physicians are limited and debatable. There is no consistency in these studies. Moreover, studies that reported a strong connection between the trustworthiness and pharmacist–physician collaboration in drug prescription lack hard evidence.