A study for the establishment of higher foodservice standards in health-care facilities

1. Area of Investigation The relative need of higher standards in healthcare foodservice facilities. Individual opinions of foodservice directors. 2. Materials and Methods Used Existing text, trade publications, interviews with industry leaders, conferences with estemmed professors and the author's own experience were used for research and evaluation. An important method used to evaluate the need for higher standards was a descriptive survey and the analysis thereof. 3. Major Findings A. The survey showed, with a 42 percent response, that the overwhelming majority of the respondents have problems within their department. B. It is presumed that these problems are caused by a lack of standards and/or a failure to meet existing standards. 4. Results and Conclusions A. The objectives of the majority of health-care facilities is to provide the best possible care at lowest possible price. The objectives of the foodservice department is to provide the best possible food at the most reasonable cost. B. Continuous education of foodservice directors in all facets of the industry are necessary so that each foodservice director has the capacity to establish and maintain, and in some cases surpass his or her own standards. C. Where no standards exist minimum requirements should be set to satisfy the objectives and goals of both the facility and foodservice department.

Hearing the Child's Voice: Their Lived Experience in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: More than 200,000 children are admitted annually to Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in the US. Research has shown young children can provide insight into their hospitalization experiences; child reports rather than parental reports are critical to understanding the child’s experience. Information relating to children’s perceptions while still in the PICU is scarce. Aims: The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate school age children’s and adolescents’ perceptions of PICU while in the PICU; changes in perceptions after transfer to the General Care Unit (GCU); differences in perceptions of school age children/adolescents and those with more invasive procedures. Methods: Interviews were conducted in PICU within 24-48 hours of admission and 24-48 hours after transfer to GCU. Data on demographics, clinical care and number/types of procedures were obtained. Results: Participants were 7 school age children, 13 adolescents; 10 Hispanic; 13 males. Five overarching themes: Coping Strategies, Environmental Factors, Stressors, Procedures/Medications, and Information. Children emphasized the importance of peer support and visitation; adolescents relied strongly on social media and texting. Parent visits sometimes were more stressful than peer visits. Video games, TV, visitors, and eating were diversional activities. In the PICU, they wanted windows to see outside and interesting things to see on the ceiling above them. Children expressed anticipatory fear of shots and procedures, frustration with lab work, and overwhelming PICU equipment. Number of child responses was higher in PICU (927) than GCU (593); the largest difference was in Environmental Factors. Variations between school age children and adolescents were primarily in Coping Strategies, especially in social support. Number of GCU procedures were the same (8 children) or greater (2 children) than PICU procedures. Discussion: Admission to PICU is a very stressful event. Perceptions from children while still in PICU found information not previously found in the literature. Longitudinal studies to identify children’s perceptions regarding PICU hospitalization and post-discharge outcomes are needed.