Ficcion de racionalidad: La memoria como operador mitico en las esteticas polares de Jorge Luis Borges y Jose Lezama Lima

The aesthetic placement and period designation of Jorge Luis Borges (1899–1986) and José Lezama Lima (1910–1976) are complicated issues among critics. Borges is considered a predecessor of the Latin American literary “boom,” but despite that taxonomy his work transcends that definition and provides a foundation for new trends, such as the “neobarroco” cultivated by Severo Sarduy. Lezama is considered part of the second wave of the “boom,” but his work feeds, stylistically, from the Spanish baroque. At the same time, Lezama's daring treatment of homoeroticism and his system of images place him after the “boom” in a narrative style that is postmodern. This study undertakes a revision of external and internal issues, revealing the key fictive elements that characterize both writers. Through discourse analysis, a poetic system is formulated, which incorporates features of the “neobarroco,” and postmodern narrative styles. ^ This dissertation uses a polar structure to analyze both poetic visions and finds that they are symmetrical. From this perspective, Borges and Lezama belong to the “core” of literature that centers its emphasis in the creation of a system versus other modes of writing in which mimetic function prevails. By doing this and by recycling world culture, they create postmodern myth: the new building material for Hispanic American literature. ^ There are a few studies that explore the works of Borges and Lezama within the context of Baroque aesthetics. This dissertation offers a comprehensive analysis that considers their poetic visions at large. Besides the difference in perspective, defined as macro-spatial in Borges and micro-spatial in Lezama, there are many similarities. Both writers question the cause and effect relationship and the use of metaphor. They share a redefinition of genre as well as a hedonistic approach to literature. This kinship in poetic vision is revealed through the polar method used for this study, which proposes a new form of aesthetic placement and period designation. ^

Ficción de Racionalidad: La memoria como operador mítico en las estéticas polares de Jorge Luis Borges y José Lezama Lima

The aesthetic placement and period designation of Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986) and José Lezama Lima (1910-1976) are complicated issues among critics. Borges is obviously considered a predecessor of the Latin American literary “boom,” but despite that taxonomy his work transcends that definition and provides a foundation for new trends and styles, such as the “neobarroco” cultivated by Severo Sarduy. Lezama is considered part of the second wave of the “boom,” but his work feeds, stylistically, from the Spanish baroque. At the same time, Lezama’s daring treatment of homoeroticism and his revolutionary system of images place him after the “boom” in a narrative style that is postmodern. This study undertakes a thorough revision of external and internal issues, revealing the key linguistic and fictive elements that characterize both writers. Through discourse analysis and close reading, a poetic system is formulated, which incorporate features of the “neobarroco,” “boom” and postmodern narrative styles. This dissertation uses a polar structure to analyze both poetic visions and concludes that they are compatible and symmetrical. From this perspective, Borges and Lezama belong to the “core” of literature that centers its emphasis in the creation of a system versus other modes of writing in which mimetic function prevails. By doing this and by recycling world culture, they create postmodern myth: the new building material for Hispanic American literature. There are only a few studies that explore the works of Borges and Lezama within the context of Baroque aesthetics. For the first time, this dissertation offers a comprehensive analysis that considers their poetic visions at large. Besides the difference in perspective, defined as macro-spatial in Borges and micro-spatial in Lezama, there are many similarities in content and form. Both writers question the cause and effect relationship and the modern use of metaphor. They also share a redefinition of genre as well as a hedonistic approach to literature and culture. This kinship in poetic vision is revealed through the polar method used for this study, which proposes a new form of aesthetic placement and period designation.

El Posnacionalismo en la Narrativa Cubana Actual: Reivindicación de lo Privado y lo Homoerótico

La novela posnacional es un fenómeno relativamente reciente en la literatura latinoamericana. Sus orígenes se sitúan en los noventa, como parte de una narrativa que se rebela contra la llamada literatura del Boom originada en los sesenta. Los escritores posnacionales—a diferencia de sus predecesores—no se muestran obsesionados por la identidad latinoamericana. La globalización, el fracaso del socialismo y el descrédito de las grandes utopías son otros fenómenos que explican la emergencia de una narrativa que trasciende los márgenes nacionales. La literatura posnacional cubana se inserta dentro de esta corriente. Luego de la caída del Muro de Berlín, los jóvenes escritores cubanos comienzan a incluir una retórica diferente en sus creaciones: eluden el compromiso político militante, evitan los mensajes altruistas y abandonan las pretensiones de definir posiciones con relación al futuro de la patria o a su propia identidad. El proyecto revolucionario y su destino—tópico narrativo por más de tres décadas—desaparece como tema. El modo particular de la literatura posnacional cubana se expresa en la desesperanza y el desencanto. El propósito de esta disertación es ejemplificar dicha noción a través del análisis de los proyectos literarios de tres escritoras cubanas contemporáneas: Ena Lucía Portela, Anna Lidia Vega Serova y Karla Suárez. Además de sus cuentos, se analizan las novelas “Djuna y Daniel”, de Ena Lucía Portela; “Ánima fatua”, de Anna Lidia Vega Serova y “La viajera” de Karla Suárez. Estas novelas, además de ser ejemplos de la existencia en Cuba de una tradición en la narrativa latinoamericana contemporánea desvinculada de las preocupaciones nacionales, rompen con el paradigma del hombre heterosexual revolucionario. Los protagonistas de estas nuevas ficciones, por lo general mujeres, son personas desarraigadas y alejadas de la sociedad, ocasionales consumidoras de estupefacientes y que practican relaciones homosexuales. La transgresión de los estereotipos de género y de los comportamientos heteronormativos se convierte en un instrumento de dinámica posmoderna que presenta nuevos códigos y supone un desafío a los principios tradicionales del modelo revolucionario cubano.