Florida International University College of Medicine Hires First Executive Associate Dean of Student Affairs

Press Release from Florida International University 's Office of Media Relations on the appointment of Dr. Sanford Markham as first executive associate dean of student affairs for Florida International University 's College of Medicine.

Florida International University College of Medicine: Creating a New Paradigm in Medical Education

Press Release on the College of Medicine.

Medical Education Progress Report (Updates)

Documents detailing the LCME accreditation process, and the proposed outline for implementation of the FLorida International University College of Medicine.

Pages from Medical Education Database for Preliminary Accreditation 2006-2007

Pages from the Medical Education Database for Preliminary Accreditation 2006-2007 with notes.

Medical Education Progress Report: Section B: Phase I Elements - Planning & Development

Outline of the LCME 3-stage Accreditation Process for Medical Education. Details the stages in the College of Medicine's efforts to initiate the accreditation process. Also details the College of Medicine's Implementation Plan and Proposed Timeline for implementation.

Institutional Self study for the Liaison Committee on Medical Education

Draft of the College of Medicine's Institutional Self-Study for the LCME. Includes an overview of the College of Medicine's history, development, and vision, as well as details regarding the organization of the college, educational programs and resources, and future goals.

Interview with Dr. Sanford Markham, the Founding Executive Associate Dean for Student Affairs of Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine

A series of interviews with the founding deans of Florida Interanational University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine conducted on April 6, 2011 by Bohyun Kim, the Digital Access Librarian at Florida International University Medical Library. This audio recording is the interview with Dr. Sanford Markham, the Founding Executive Associate Dean for Student Affairs at Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, and the format of the audio file is MP3.

The effect of the advanced placement examination for credit policy by the Florida State universities on the acceleration of a student's postsecondary education

The purpose of this research study was to determine if the Advanced Placement program as it is recognized by the universities in the Florida State University System (SUS) truly serves as an acceleration mechanism for those students who enter an SUS institution with passing AP scores. Despite mandates which attempt to control uniformity of policy, each public university in Florida determines which courses will be exempted and the number of credits they will grant for passing Advanced Placement courses.^ This is a descriptive study in which the AP policies of each of the SUS institutions were compared. Additionally, the college attendance and graduation data on members of a cohort of 593 Broward County high school graduates of the class of June, 1992 were compared. Approximately 28% of the cohort members entered university with passing Advanced Placement scores.^ The rate of early and on time graduation was significantly dependent on the Advanced Placement standing of the students in the cohort. Given the financial and human cost involved, it is recommended that all state universities bring their Advanced Placement policies into line with each other and implement a uniform Advanced Placement policy. It is also recommended that a follow-up study be conducted with a new cohort bound under the current 120 credit limitation for graduation. ^

GRE as a predictor of graduate student success at a Hispanic serving institution of higher education

Accurately predicting the success of graduate students is an important aspect of determining which students should be admitted into graduate programs. The GRE is a pivotal factor to examine since it is one of the most widely used criteria for graduate school admission. Even though the GRE is advertised as an accurate tool for predicting first year graduate GPA, there is a lack of research on long term success factors such as time to degree and graduate rate (Luthy, 1996; Powers, 2004). Furthermore, since most studies have low minority sample sizes, the validity of the GRE may not be the same across all groups (ETS, 2008b; Kuncel, Hezlett, & Ones, 2001). Another gap in GRE studies is that few researchers analyze student characteristics, which may alter or moderate the prediction validity of the GRE. Thus, student characteristics such as degree of academic involvement, mentorship interactions, and other academic and social experiences have not been widely examined in this context. These gaps in the analysis of GRE validity are especially relevant given the high attrition rates within of some graduate programs (e.g., an estimated 68% of doctoral student never complete their programs in urban universities; Lovitts, 2001). A sequential mixed methods design was used to answer the research questions in two phases. The quantitative phase used student data files to analyze the relationship of two success variables (graduation rate and graduate GPA) to the GRE scores as well as other academic and demographic graduate student characteristics. The qualitative phase served to complement the first phase by describing a wider range of characteristics from the 11 graduate students who were interviewed. Both proximal and distal moderators influence student behaviors and success in graduate school. In the first phase of the study, the GRE was the distal facilitator under analysis. Findings suggested that both the GRE Quantitative and the GRE Verbal were predictors of success for master’s students, but the GRE Quantitative was not predictive of success for doctoral students. Other student characteristics such as demographic variables and disciplinary area were also predictors of success for the population of students studied. In the second phase of the study, it was inconclusive whether the GRE was predictive of graduate student success; though it did influence access to graduate programs. Furthermore, proximal moderators such as student involvement, faculty/peer interactions, motivational factors, and program structure were perceived to be facilitators and/or detractors for success.