1 resultado para cognitive diagnostic model
em Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (242)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (15)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (47)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (53)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (6)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (12)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (23)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (6)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (33)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (13)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (55)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (196)
- University of Washington (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
In several areas of health professionals (pediatricians, nutritionists, orthopedists, endocrinologists, dentists, etc.) are used in the assessment of bone age to diagnose growth disorders in children. Through interviews with specialists in diagnostic imaging and research done in the literature, we identified the TW method - Tanner and Whitehouse as the most efficient. Even achieving better results than other methods, it is still not the most used, due to the complexity of their use. This work presents the possibility of automation of this method and therefore that its use more widespread. Also in this work, they are met two important steps in the evaluation of bone age, identification and classification of regions of interest. Even in the radiography in which the positioning of the hands were not suitable for TW method, the identification algorithm of the fingers showed good results. As the use AAM - Active Appearance Models showed good results in the identification of regions of interest even in radiographs with high contrast and brightness variation. It has been shown through appearance, good results in the classification of the epiphysis in their stages of development, being chosen the average epiphysis finger III (middle) to show the performance. The final results show an average percentage of 90% hit and misclassified, it was found that the error went away just one stage of the correct stage.