1 resultado para Socio-ecological systems
em Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (25)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (13)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (76)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (11)
- Ecology and Society (25)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (10)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (23)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (10)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (12)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (30)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (302)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (5)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (9)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (15)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
Nowadays we meet many different evaluation methods regarding the ecological performance of green surfaces and parks. All these methods are extremely valuable in determining how well a green surface performs from ecological aspect and to what extent the environment were damaged if these sites would be built or would be developed any other way causing reduction of green surfaces. The goal of the article is to clarify the differences between two evaluation methods (GSI – Green Space Intensity, BARC – Biological Activity Rate Calculation) suitable for urban green infrastructure analysis and to see if any significant difference can be observed evaluating the same site by these methods. Our research sites are in Budapest and their sizes vary between 2,5-8 acres. The most important aspects of site analysis are the following: size and boundaries of the park, existence or lack of water features, the characteristics of their surfaces and the complexity of vegetation. We summarize the data of the site analysis in tables, make a summarizing diagram for visual representation and draw conclusions from the results. As a final step, we evaluate how these two evaluation systems relate to urban open space developments.