Kormányzati koordináció Magyarországon. Esettanulmány az egyablakos ügyfélszolgálati reformról (Governmental coordination in Hungary: Case study on the one-stopgovernment service reform)

A tanulmány a központi kormányzat koordinációs politikájának jellemző mintázatait vizsgálja. A vizsgálat fókuszában a magyar kormányzati szférában újonnan bevezetett koordinációs eszköz, a kormányablak, mint egyablakos ügyfélszolgálati modell tanulmányozása áll. A kutatás empirikus bázisát a kormányzati és közigazgatási kulcsszereplőkkel készített kvalitatív interjúkból és a dokumentumelemzésből származó adatok analitikus vizsgálata adja. A szerző a tanulmányban szemügyre veszi a kormányzati koordináció gyakorlatát Magyarországon, elemzi, hogy ez mennyire tér el más országokétól. ____ The paper examines, on the basis of qualitative interviews and documentary analysis, the emerging patterns of government policy coordination in Hungary. The focus of the paper is on a recent case of innovative policy coordination measure introduced by the Hungarian government: the newly established “Government Windows”, the one-stop-government initiative. The paper investigates such questions as what the main characteristics of the coordination traditions in Hungary are, what are the specific structural features of the newly established governmental coordination instruments, and how do they differ from of other countries’ similar experiences.

Recent Developments in the Autonomy and Governance of Higher Education Institutions in Hungary: the Introduction of the Chancellor System

After the change of regime in 1989, Hungarian higher education started to return to its Humboldtian tradition. It was widely accepted that academic freedom could be guaranteed by high degree of institutional autonomy manifested especially in structures of self-governance and avoidance of direct state supervision/interventions. Attempts to introduce boards and other supervising bodies were successfully resisted until 2011. The new government coming into power in 2010, however, introduced new mechanisms of supervision and changed institutional governance and reduced institutional autonomy considerably. Changes in the selection of rectors, the appearance of state-appointed financial inspectors and the newly appointed Chancellors responsible for the finance, maintenance and administration of institutions are important milestones in this process. In the paper I review these developments focusing especially on the analysis of the Chancellor system.