3 resultados para traduzione confronto Hurwitz Pincherle Weierstrass

em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14H40, 20M14.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14J26.