3 resultados para taxonomy of metacognitive development

em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The advisability of analyzing the banks liquidity and profitability as the key factor when building the comparative estimate of their functioning is considered. The procedure of formal description of the bank stable functioning indices is substantiated. Fuzzy interpretation of the bank management efficiency estimation is offered. The possibility to formalize the bank functioning estimates on the basis of the corresponding fuzzy set levels hierarchy is analyzed. The comparative estimate of different bank systems functioning is given.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The various questions of creation of integrated development environment for computer training systems are considered in the given paper. The information technologies that can be used for creation of the integrated development environment are described. The different didactic aspects of realization of such systems are analyzed. The ways to improve the efficiency and quality of learning process with computer training systems for distance education are pointed.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Big data comes in various ways, types, shapes, forms and sizes. Indeed, almost all areas of science, technology, medicine, public health, economics, business, linguistics and social science are bombarded by ever increasing flows of data begging to be analyzed efficiently and effectively. In this paper, we propose a rough idea of a possible taxonomy of big data, along with some of the most commonly used tools for handling each particular category of bigness. The dimensionality p of the input space and the sample size n are usually the main ingredients in the characterization of data bigness. The specific statistical machine learning technique used to handle a particular big data set will depend on which category it falls in within the bigness taxonomy. Large p small n data sets for instance require a different set of tools from the large n small p variety. Among other tools, we discuss Preprocessing, Standardization, Imputation, Projection, Regularization, Penalization, Compression, Reduction, Selection, Kernelization, Hybridization, Parallelization, Aggregation, Randomization, Replication, Sequentialization. Indeed, it is important to emphasize right away that the so-called no free lunch theorem applies here, in the sense that there is no universally superior method that outperforms all other methods on all categories of bigness. It is also important to stress the fact that simplicity in the sense of Ockham’s razor non-plurality principle of parsimony tends to reign supreme when it comes to massive data. We conclude with a comparison of the predictive performance of some of the most commonly used methods on a few data sets.