5 resultados para p -and q-analytic
em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 33D15, 33D90, 39A13
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 42A38, 42C40, 33D15, 33D60
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 30C10
Resumo:
In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.
Resumo:
ACM Computing Classification System (1998): E.4.