Admissible Substitutions in Sequent Calculi

For first-order classical logic a new notion of admissible substitution is defined. This notion allows optimizing the procedure of the application of quantifier rules when logical inference search is made in sequent calculi. Our objective is to show that such a computer-oriented sequent technique may be created that does not require a preliminary skolemization of initial formulas and that is efficiently comparable with methods exploiting the skolemization. Some results on its soundness and completeness are given.

Comparing Entire Prototypes at Semigroup Homomorphisms and Specifically at Regular Languages Substitutions

The following statements are proven: A correspondence of a semigroup in another one is a homomorphism if and only if when the entire prototype of the product of images contains (always) the product of their entire prototypes. The Kleene closure of the maximal rewriting of a regular language at a regular language substitution contains in the maximal rewriting of the Kleene closure of the initial regular language at the same substitution. Let the image of the maximal rewriting of a regular language at a regular language substitution covers the entire given regular language. Then the image of any word from the maximal rewriting of the Kleene closure of the initial regular language covers by the image of a set of some words from the Kleene closure of the maximal rewriting of this given regular language everything at the same given regular language substitution. The purposefulness of the ¯rst statement is substantiated philosophically and epistemologically connected with the spirit of previous mathematical results of the author. A corollary of its is indicated about the membership problem at a regular substitution.