1 resultado para Participatory methodologies
em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (29)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (76)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (32)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (51)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (14)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (11)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (8)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (2)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (123)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (15)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Open Access Repository of Indian Theses (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (122)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (24)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (19)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (25)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (21)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (28)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (9)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (12)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (82)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Agile methodologies are becoming more popular in the software development process nowadays. The iterative development lifecycle, openness to frequent changes, tight cooperation with the client and among the software engineers are turning into more and more effective practices and respond to a higher extend to the current business needs. It is natural to raise the question which methodology is the most suitable for use when starting and managing a project. This depends on many factors—product characteristics, technologies used, client’s and developer’s experience, project type. A systematic analysis of the most common problems appearing when developing a particular type of projects—public portal solutions, is proposed. In the case at hand a very close interaction with various types of end users is observed. This is a prerequisite for permanent changes during the development and support cycles, which makes them ideal candidates for using an agile methodology. We will compare the ways in which each methodology addresses the specific problems arising and will finish with ranking them according to their relevance. This might help the project manager in choosing one or a combination of the methodologies.