10 resultados para First Brazilian Colloquium of Mathematics
em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS
Resumo:
First order characterizations of pseudoconvex functions are investigated in terms of generalized directional derivatives. A connection with the invexity is analysed. Well-known first order characterizations of the solution sets of pseudolinear programs are generalized to the case of pseudoconvex programs. The concepts of pseudoconvexity and invexity do not depend on a single definition of the generalized directional derivative.
Resumo:
In October 1997 we celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the founding of the Institute for Mathematics and Informatics (IMI) of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS).
Resumo:
The Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics (FMI) of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” is briefly presented as an educational and research institution. The possible contribution of FMI to KT-DigiCULT-BG project is analyzed.
Resumo:
The digitization practice for retro-converting of the mathematical periodicals, published by the Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (IMI-BAS) and the followed benefits for long-term preserving and assuring open access to these materials is discussed in the article.
Resumo:
We consider the existence and uniqueness problem for partial differential-functional equations of the first order with the initial condition for which the right-hand side depends on the derivative of unknown function with deviating argument.
Resumo:
Dedicated to 75th birthday of Prof. A.M. Mathai, Mathematical Subject Classification 2010:26A33, 33C10, 33C20, 33C50, 33C60, 26A09
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14H40, 20M14.
Resumo:
In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J70, 35P15.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14J26.