4 resultados para Farkas lemma

em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

∗Partially supported by Grant MM409/94 Of the Ministy of Science and Education, Bulgaria. ∗∗Partially supported by Grant MM442/94 of the Ministy of Science and Education, Bulgaria.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 42B30, 46E35, 35B65.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

∗Partially supported by Grant MM 409/94 of the Mininstry of Education, Science and Technology, Bulgaria. ∗∗Partially supported by Grants MM 521/95, MM 442/94 of the Mininstry of Education, Science and Technology, Bulgaria.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.