On the Weight Distribution of the Coset Leaders of Constacyclic Codes

Constacyclic codes with one and the same generator polynomial and distinct length are considered. We give a generalization of the previous result of the first author [4] for constacyclic codes. Suitable maps between vector spaces determined by the lengths of the codes are applied. It is proven that the weight distributions of the coset leaders don’t depend on the word length, but on generator polynomials only. In particular, we prove that every constacyclic code has the same weight distribution of the coset leaders as a suitable cyclic code.

Quadratic Mean Radius of a Polynomial in C(Z)

* Dedicated to the memory of Prof. N. Obreshkoff

DML and RusDML – Virtual Library Initiatives for Covering All Mathematics Electronically

With the rapidly growing activities in electronic publishing ideas came up to install global repositories which deal with three mainstreams in this enterprise: storing the electronic material currently available, pursuing projects to solve the archiving problem for this material with the ambition to preserve the content in readable form for future generations, and to capture the printed literature in digital versions providing good access and search facilities for the readers. Long-term availability of published research articles in mathematics and easy access to them is a strong need for researchers working with mathematics. Hence in this domain some pioneering projects have been established addressing the above mentioned problems.

Note on Radius Problems for Certain Class of Analytic Functions

MSC 2010: 30C45

Weierstrass Points with First Non-Gap Four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14H40, 20M14.

Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

Weierstrass Points with First Non-Gap Four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve II

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14J26.

Growth Theorem and the Radius of Starlikeness of Close-to-Spirallike Functions

AMS Subj. Classification: 30C45