Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

Weierstrass Points with First Non-Gap Four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve II

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14J26.

Relationship between Extremal and Sum Processes Generated by the same Point Process

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 60G51, secondary 60G70, 60F17.

On a Generalization of a Theorem due to Larcombe on the Sum of a 3F2 Series

MSC 2010: 33C20