22 resultados para Regularity lemma


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 60G18, 60E07

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2002 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35L80

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2002 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35G20, 47H30

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 60H15, 60H40

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 49J15, 49J30, 53B50.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

MSC 2010: 26A33, 34A08, 34K37