1 resultado para tutor workload
em Aston University Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (17)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Boston University Digital Common (11)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (78)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (14)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (13)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (12)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (8)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (369)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (49)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (128)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (39)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RU-FFYL. Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofiía y Letras. UNAM. - Mexico (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (19)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidad Politécnica Salesiana Ecuador (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (8)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (27)
- University of Michigan (22)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (15)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.