Cortical processing of human gut sensation: an evoked potential study

The rectum has a unique physiological role as a sensory organ and differs in its afferent innervation from other gut organs that do not normally mediate conscious sensation. We compared the central processing of human esophageal, duodenal, and rectal sensation using cortical evoked potentials (CEP) in 10 healthy volunteers (age range 21-34 yr). Esophageal and duodenal CEP had similar morphology in all subjects, whereas rectal CEP had two different but reproducible morphologies. The rectal CEP latency to the first component P1 (69 ms) was shorter than both duodenal (123 ms; P = 0.008) and esophageal CEP latencies (106 ms; P = 0.004). The duodenal CEP amplitude of the P1-N1 component (5.0 µV) was smaller than that of the corresponding esophageal component (5.7 µV; P = 0.04) but similar to that of the corresponding rectal component (6.5 µV; P = 0.25). This suggests that rectal sensation is either mediated by faster-conducting afferent pathways or that there is a difference in the orientation or volume of cortical neurons representing the different gut organs. In conclusion, the physiological and anatomic differences between gut organs are reflected in differences in the characteristics of their afferent pathways and cortical processing.

The 'cancer cachectic factor'

The object of this study was to summarize information on catabolic factors produced by tumours which lead to tissue catabolism in cancer cachexia and to use this information for the development of effective therapy. The study population was made up of patients with cancer cachexia and weight loss greater than 1 kg month-1. They had a varied range of carcinomas, particularly pancreatic, but also of the breast, ovary, lung, colon and rectum. Cachectic factors were isolated by standard biochemical methods, and the mechanism of tissue catabolism was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. We isolated a 24-kDa sulphated glycoprotein produced by cachexia-inducing murine and human tumours, which induces catabolism of myofibrillar proteins in skeletal muscle and for this reason has been named proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF). PIF was shown to be present in a diverse range of carcinomas in patients whose rate of weight loss exceeded 1.0 kg month-1. Administration of PIF to normal mice produced a rapid decrease in body weight, which arose primarily from a loss of skeletal muscle, accompanied by increased mRNA levels for ubiquitin, the ubiquitin-carrier protein (E214k), and proteasome subunits. This suggests that PIF induces protein catabolism through an increased expression of the key components of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. The action of PIF was attenuated both in vitro and in vivo by eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Oral EPA has been found to stabilize the body weight of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and, when combined with an energy- and protein-rich nutritional supplement, to produce weight gain arising solely from an increase in lean body mass. Nutritional supplementation alone is unable to reverse the process of muscle wasting in cancer patients, since this arises from activation of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway by PIF, which is independent of nutrient intake. EPA is able to down-regulate the increased expression of this pathway and prevents muscle wasting in cancer patients.