Improving the management of behaviour that challenges associated with dementia in care homes:protocol for pharmacy-health psychology intervention feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: The inappropriate use of antipsychotics in people with dementia for behaviour that challenges is associated with an estimated 1800 deaths annually. However, solely focusing on antipsychotics may transfer prescribing to other equally dangerous psychotropics. Little is known about the role of pharmacists in the management of psychotropics used to treat behaviours that challenge. This research aims to determine whether it is feasible to implement and measure the effectiveness of a combined pharmacy-health psychology intervention incorporating a medication review and staff training package to limit the prescription of psychotropics to manage behaviour that challenges in care home residents with dementia. METHODS/ANALYSIS: 6 care homes within the West Midlands will be recruited. People with dementia receiving medication for behaviour that challenges, or their personal consultee, will be approached regarding participation. Medication used to treat behaviour that challenges will be reviewed by the pharmacist, in collaboration with the general practitioner (GP), person with dementia and carer. The behavioural intervention consists of a training package for care home staff and GPs promoting person-centred care and treating behaviours that challenge as an expression of unmet need. The primary outcome measure is the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH). Other outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D and DEMQoL), cognition (sMMSE), health economic (CSRI) and prescribed medication including whether recommendations were implemented. Outcome data will be collected at 6 weeks, and 3 and 6 months. Pretraining and post-training interviews will explore stakeholders' expectations and experiences of the intervention. Data will be used to estimate the sample size for a definitive study. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: The project has received a favourable opinion from the East Midlands REC (15/EM/3014). If potential participants lack capacity, a personal consultee will be consulted regarding participation in line with the Mental Capacity Act. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

Accessibility indices and linked trips: a case study of the elderly

The confusion over the concept of accessibility in transport planning and the deficiencies of existing accessibility indices are examined by developing a conceptual framework of accessibility with a fundamental distinction being drawn between the, often conflicting, theoretical and practical dimensions. The theoretical validity of alternative indices is assessed with reference to the problems and assumptions implicit in defining, measuring, valuing and aggregating the variables and components comprising accessibility. The major deficiencies of existing indices are identified as the inability of indices to take account of the potential to link trips between more than one activity location and the level of assumptions implicit in valuing and aggregating accessibility information. In this context, it is argued that accessibility information is more appropriately expressed on a comparative basis in the form of a profile rather than as a composite single-unit index and that the present confines of accessibility measurement must be extended in line with current developments in disaggregate travel and activity modelling. The sensitivity of accessibility levels to the use of alternative value judgements, alternative forms and levels of aggregation and the inclusion of information on the potential to link trips is examined by undertaking a case study. Accessibility profiles are developed for 23 zones in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham showing the accessibility of the elderly to post offices and grocers. In a practical context, the profiles assist in identifying areas and individuals with relatively poor accessibility. The incidence and nature of linked trip-making and its significance and implications for accessibility measurement are explored further by analysing the results of a survey of the elderly's travel patterns. It is concluded that future accessibility analysis should be undertaken at a disaggregate level, taking account of the potential opportunity available from nonhome as well as home origins.

Diabetes in the very elderly:need for an individualised approach

Background: Intensive risk factor management is recommended for individuals with diabetes. However, it is not known if such an approach is appropriate in the elderly with multiple comorbidities and limited life expectancy. The aim of this study was to characterise a cohort of very elderly individuals with diabetes and assess the impact of known risk factors on mortality. Methods: This was a retrospective audit approved by the clinical audit lead. All patients aged >80 years who attended diabetes outpatient clinics 2 years prior to the date of the audit (April 2012) were identified from clinic records. A detailed history including demographics, comorbidities and treatment were collected. Blood pressure readings, HbA1c, cholesterol and renal function were extracted and the mean of these readings was recorded. Survival status at 2 years was recorded for all patients. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19. Results: Data were available for 864 (381 male, 483 female) patients. The majority (75%) lived in their own home. More than 60% had multiple comorbidities and 25% had a prior history of cardiovascular disease. Two-thirds of the patients had more than one hospital admission in 2 years and a third had more than three admissions. 60% were on either insulin or a sulfonylurea. Mean HbA1c was 7.6%, cholesterol 4.2mmol/l, systolic blood pressure 145mmHg and eGFR 53ml/min. Over 2 years, 174 (20%)had died. Age, creatinine and previous coronary heart disease were significant predictors of death. Conclusion: The benefits of intensive diabetes management appear to be uncertain in very elderly patients. The need for intensive treatment must therefore be individualised to each patient.