Compensation of intra-channel nonlinear fibre impairments using simplified digital back-propagation algorithm

We investigate a digital back-propagation simplification method to enable computationally-efficient digital nonlinearity compensation for a coherently-detected 112 Gb/s polarization multiplexed quadrature phase shifted keying transmission over a 1,600 km link (20x80km) with no inline compensation. Through numerical simulation, we report up to 80% reduction in required back-propagation steps to perform nonlinear compensation, in comparison to the standard back-propagation algorithm. This method takes into account the correlation between adjacent symbols at a given instant using a weighted-average approach, and optimization of the position of nonlinear compensator stage to enable practical digital back-propagation.

Reduction of nonlinear intrachannel effects by channel asymmetry in transmission lines with strong bit overlapping

We have examined the statistics of simulated bit-error rates in optical transmission systems with strong patterning effects and have found strong correlation between the probability of marks in a pseudorandom pattern and the error-free transmission distance. We discuss how a reduced density of marks can be achieved by preencoding optical data.

Channel model and lower capacity bound for the transmission based on nonlinear Fourier transform

The integrability of the nonlinear Schräodinger equation (NLSE) by the inverse scattering transform shown in a seminal work [1] gave an interesting opportunity to treat the corresponding nonlinear channel similar to a linear one by using the nonlinear Fourier transform. Integrability of the NLSE is in the background of the old idea of eigenvalue communications [2] that was resurrected in recent works [3{7]. In [6, 7] the new method for the coherent optical transmission employing the continuous nonlinear spectral data | nonlinear inverse synthesis was introduced. It assumes the modulation and detection of data using directly the continuous part of nonlinear spectrum associated with an integrable transmission channel (the NLSE in the case considered). Although such a transmission method is inherently free from nonlinear impairments, the noisy signal corruptions, arising due to the ampli¯er spontaneous emission, inevitably degrade the optical system performance. We study properties of the noise-corrupted channel model in the nonlinear spectral domain attributed to NLSE. We derive the general stochastic equations governing the signal evolution inside the nonlinear spectral domain and elucidate the properties of the emerging nonlinear spectral noise using well-established methods of perturbation theory based on inverse scattering transform [8]. It is shown that in the presence of small noise the communication channel in the nonlinear domain is the additive Gaussian channel with memory and signal-dependent correlation matrix. We demonstrate that the effective spectral noise acquires colouring", its autocorrelation function becomes slow decaying and non-diagonal as a function of \frequencies", and the noise loses its circular symmetry, becoming elliptically polarized. Then we derive a low bound for the spectral effiency for such a channel. Our main result is that by using the nonlinear spectral techniques one can significantly increase the achievable spectral effiency compared to the currently available methods [9]. REFERENCES 1. Zakharov, V. E. and A. B. Shabat, Sov. Phys. JETP, Vol. 34, 62{69, 1972. 2. Hasegawa, A. and T. Nyu, J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 11, 395{399, 1993. 3. Yousefi, M. I. and F. R. Kschischang, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 60, 4312{4328, 2014. 4. Yousefi, M. I. and F. R. Kschischang, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 60, 4329{4345 2014. 5. Yousefi, M. I. and F. R. Kschischang, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 60, 4346{4369, 2014. 6. Prilepsky, J. E., S. A. Derevyanko, K. J. Blow, I. Gabitov, and S. K. Turitsyn, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 113, 013901, 2014. 7. Le, S. T., J. E. Prilepsky, and S. K. Turitsyn, Opt. Express, Vol. 22, 26720{26741, 2014. 8. Kaup, D. J. and A. C. Newell, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 361, 413{446, 1978. 9. Essiambre, R.-J., G. Kramer, P. J. Winzer, G. J. Foschini, and B. Goebel, J. Lightwave Technol., Vol. 28, 662{701, 2010.