International Union of Pharmacology. XXXII. The mammalian calcitonin gene-related peptides, adrenomedullin, amylin, and calcitonin receptors

The calcitonin family of peptides comprises calcitonin, amylin two calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRPs), and adrenomedullin. The first calcitonin receptor was cloned in 1991. Its pharmacology is complicated by the existence of several splice variants. The receptors for the other members the family are made up of subunits. The calcitonin-like receptor (CL receptor) requires a single transmembrane domain protein, termed receptor activity modifying protein, RAMP1, to function as a CGRP receptor. RAMP2 and -3 enable the same CL receptor to behave as an adrenomedullin receptor. Although the calcitonin receptor does not require RAMP to bind and respond to calcitonin, it can associate with the RAMPs, resulting in a series of receptors that typically have high affinity for amylin and varied affinity for CGRP. This review aims to reconcile what is observed when the receptors are reconstituted in vitro with the properties they show in native cells and tissues. Experimental conditions must be rigorously controlled because different degrees of protein expression may markedly modify pharmacology in such a complex situation. Recommendations, which follow International Union of Pharmacology guidelines, are made for the nomenclature of these multimeric receptors.

Novel peptide antagonists of adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors:identification, pharmacological characterization, and interactions with position 74 in receptor activity-modifying protein 1/3

Human adrenomedullin (AM) is a 52-amino acid peptide belonging to the calcitonin peptide family, which also includes calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and AM2. The two AM receptors, AM(1) and AM(2), are calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL)/receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) (RAMP2 and RAMP3, respectively) heterodimers. CGRP receptors comprise CL/RAMP1. The only human AM receptor antagonist (AM(22-52)) is a truncated form of AM; it has low affinity and is only weakly selective for AM(1) over AM(2) receptors. To develop novel AM receptor antagonists, we explored the importance of different regions of AM in interactions with AM(1), AM(2), and CGRP receptors. AM(22-52) was the framework for generating further AM fragments (AM(26-52) and AM(30-52)), novel AM/alphaCGRP chimeras (C1-C5 and C9), and AM/AM(2) chimeras (C6-C8). cAMP assays were used to screen the antagonists at all receptors to determine their affinity and selectivity. Circular dichroism spectroscopy was used to investigate the secondary structures of AM and its related peptides. The data indicate that the structures of AM, AM2, and alphaCGRP differ from one another. Our chimeric approach enabled the identification of two nonselective high-affinity antagonists of AM(1), AM(2), and CGRP receptors (C2 and C6), one high-affinity antagonist of AM(2) receptors (C7), and a weak antagonist selective for the CGRP receptor (C5). By use of receptor mutagenesis, we also determined that the C-terminal nine amino acids of AM seem to be responsible for its interaction with Glu74 of RAMP3. We provide new information on the structure-activity relationship of AM, alphaCGRP, and AM2 and how AM interacts with CGRP and AM(2) receptors.

Characterization of CGRP receptor binding

CGRP receptor binding may be measured using homogenates of cell membranes or intact cells. Here a microcentrifugation-based assay is described that utilizes radioiodinated CGRP in displacement studies to determine the binding parameters for any ligand that interacts with CGRP receptors. A similar assay is described for binding to cultured cells. The protocols may be adapted for other radioligands or for filtration-based assays. The main problems with CGRP binding assays can usually be traced to degradation of the radioligand or displacing ligands. Also, some cell lines fail to express CGRP receptors after extensive passage. CGRP binding assays provide a rapid and easy approach for distinguishing between receptors for CGRP and related peptides such as adrenomedullin and amylin.

Characterization of receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin on the guinea-pig vas deferens

1. The receptors which mediate the effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), amylin and adrenomedullin on the guinea-pig vas deferens have been investigated. 2. All three peptides cause concentration dependant inhibitions of the electrically stimulated twitch response (pD 2s for CGRP, amylin and adrenomedullin of 7.90 ± 0.11, 7.70 ± 0.19 and 7.25 ± 0.10 respectively). 3. CGRP 8-37 (1 μM) and AC187 (10 μM) showed little antagonist activity against adrenomedullin. 4. Adrenomedullin 22-52 by itself inhibited the electrically stimulated contractions of the vas deferens and also antagonized the responses to CGRP, amylin and adrenomedullin. 5. [ 125I]-adrenomedullin labelled a single population of binding sites in vas deferens membranes with a pIC 50 of 8.91 and a capacity of 643 fmol mg -1. Its selectivity profile was adrenomedullin > AC187 > CGRP = amylin. It was clearly distinct from a site labelled by [ 125I]-CGRP (pIC 50 = 8.73, capacity = 114 fmol mg -1, selectivity CGRP > amylin = AC187 > adrenomedullin). [ 125I]-amylin bound to two sites with a total capacity of 882 fmol mg -1. 6. Although CGRP has been shown to act at a CGRP 2 receptor on the vas deferens with low sensitivity to CGRP 8-37, this antagonist displaced [ 125I]-CGRP with high affinity from vas deferens membranes. This affinity was unaltered by increasing the temperature from 4°C to 25°C, suggesting the anomalous behaviour of CGRP 8-37 is not due to temperature differences between binding and functional assays.

Structural determinants for binding to CGRP receptors expressed by human SK-N-MC and Col 29 cells:Studies with chimeric and other peptides

1. Structure-activity relationships for the binding of human α-calcitonin gene-related peptide 8-37 (hαCGRP8-37) have been investigated at the CGRP receptors expressed by human SK-N-MC (neuroblastoma) and Col 29 (colonic epithelia) cells by radioligand binding assays and functional assays (hαCGRP stimulation of adenylate cyclase). 2. On SK-N-MC cells the potency order was hαCGRP8-37 > hαCGRP19-37 = AC187 > rat amylin8-37 > hα[Tyr0]-CGRP28-37 (apparent pKBS of 7.49 ± 0.25, 5.89 ± 0.20, 6.18 ± 0.19, 5.85 ± 0.19 and 5.25 ± 0.07). The SK-N-MC receptor appeared CGRP1-like. 3. On Col 29 cells, only hαCGRP8-37 of the above compounds was able to antagonize the actions of hαCGRP (apparent pKB = 6.48 ± 0.28). Its receptor appeared CGRP2-like. 4. hα[Ala11,18]-CGRP8-37, where the amphipathic nature of the N-terminal α-helix has been reduced, bound to SK-N-MC cells a 100 fold less strongly than hαCGRP8-37. 5. On SK-N-MC cells, hαCGRP(8-18, 28-37) (M433) and mastoparan-hαCGRP28-37 (M432) had apparent pKBS of 6.64 ± 0.16 and 6.42 ± 0.26, suggesting that residues 19-27 play a minor role in binding. The physico-chemical properties of residues 8-18 may be more important than any specific side-chain interactions. 6. M433 was almost as potent as hαCGRP8-37 on Col 29 cells (apparent pKB = 6.17 ± 0.20). Other antagonists were inactive.

Changes in inositol lipids and phosphates after stimulation of the MAS-transfected NG115-401L-C3 cell line by mitogenic and non-mitogenic stimuli

A neuronal cell line (NG115-401L-C3) was stimulated by mitogenic (angiotensin) and non-mitogenic (bradykinin) peptides and examined for the time course of changes in the levels of radiolabelled inositol phosphates and phospholipids. Both peptides stimulated the time-dependent production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 and related metabolites. Bradykinin caused a much larger increase in Ins(1,4,5)P3 than did angiotensin. However, both peptides stimulated similar rises in the levels of Ins(1,3,4)P3 and InsP4. Bradykinin but not angiotensin, caused a rapid (within 2 s) fall in the levels of PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(4)P. Serum pretreatment of the cells caused a 2-3-fold potentiation of both the responses to bradykinin and angiotensin. Although significant levels of PtdIns(3)P were detected in resting cells neither mitogenic (angiotensin, insulin-like growth factor I, transforming growth factor beta) nor non-mitogenic (bradykinin, nerve growth factor interleukin-1) receptor activation changed its levels, arguing against regulation of either PtdIns 3-kinase or PtdIns(3)P phosphatase. We conclude that, as judged by the levels of its product. PtdIns(3)P, the enzyme PtdIns 3-kinase is not activated. This questions the significance of this activity in the receptor-mediated initiation of DNA synthesis.

Structure-function analysis of amino acid 74 of human RAMP1 and RAMP3 and its role in peptide interactions with adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors

The receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are complexes of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP). The CGRP receptor is a CLR/RAMP1 pairing whereas CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3 constitute two subtypes of AM receptor: AM(1) and AM(2), respectively. Previous studies identified Glu74 in RAMP3 to be important for AM binding and potency. To further understand the importance of this residue and its equivalent in RAMP1 (Trp74) we substituted the native amino acids with several others. In RAMP3, these were Trp, Phe, Tyr, Ala, Ser, Thr, Arg and Asn; in RAMP1, Glu, Phe, Tyr, Ala and Asn substitutions were made. The mutant RAMPs were co-expressed with CLR in Cos7 cells; receptor function in response to AM, AM(2)/intermedin and CGRP was measured in a cAMP assay and cell surface expression was determined by ELISA. Phe reduced AM potency in RAMP3 but had no effect in RAMP1. In contrast, Tyr had no effect in RAMP3 but enhanced AM potency in RAMP1. Most other substitutions had a small effect on AM potency in both receptors whereas there was little impact on CGRP or AM(2) potency. Overall, these data suggest that the geometry and charge of the residue at position 74 contribute to how AM interacts with the AM(2) and CGRP receptors and confirms the role of this position in dictating differential AM pharmacology at the AM(2) and CGRP receptors.

Adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors in endocrine-related cancers:opportunities and challenges

Adrenomedullin (AM), adrenomedullin 2 (AM2/intermedin) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are members of the calcitonin family of peptides. They can act as growth or survival factors for a number of tumours, including those that are endocrine-related. One mechanism through which this occurs is stimulating angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. AM is expressed by numerous tumour types and for some cancers, plasma AM levels can be correlated with the severity of the disease. In cancer models, lowering AM content or blocking AM receptors can reduce tumour mass. AM receptors are complexes formed between a seven transmembrane protein, calcitonin receptor-like receptor and one of the two accessory proteins, receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) 2 or 3 to give the AM1 and AM2 receptors respectively. AM also has affinity at the CGRP receptor, which uses RAMP1. Unfortunately, due to a lack of selective pharmacological tools or antibodies to distinguish AM and CGRP receptors, the precise receptors and signal transduction pathways used by the peptides are often uncertain. Two other membrane proteins, RDC1 and L1/G10D (the 'ADMR'), are not currently considered to be genuine CGRP or AM receptors. In order to properly evaluate whether AM or CGRP receptor inhibition has a role in cancer therapy, it is important to identify which receptors mediate the effects of these peptides. To effectively distinguish AM1 and AM2 receptors, selective receptor antagonists need to be developed. The development of specific CGRP receptor antagonists suggests that this is now feasible.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin and flushing

Administration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or adrenomedullin (AM) can cause facial flushing, suggesting that the peptides may be important in hot flushes experienced particularly by post-menopausal women. Five studies have measured plasma CGRP concentrations in post-menopausal women who suffer from flushes; all demonstrated elevations of between 170% and 320% over control. Three of the studies showed a temporal relationship between flushes and CGRP elevation. A further study has shown that CGRP is elevated in the urine of women who suffer from flushes. Only a single study has investigated flushes in pre-menopausal women; no elevation of CGRP was observed. Flushes are also experienced by men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Whilst one study failed to find any increase in CGRP in the urine of these individuals, a small study has identified an increase in plasma CGRP. No studies have investigated plasma AM or the related peptide, intermedin/AM2. Overall, there is good evidence to show that flushes in post-menopausal women are accompanied by an increase in CGRP. CGRP could act centrally on the thermoregulatory centre of the hypothalamus as well as peripherally to cause vasodilation and sweating. However, it remains to be demonstrated that the elevated CGRP causes flushes. Recently developed CGRP antagonists provide an opportunity to test this hypothesis. If they are successful, they may represent a useful alternative to oestrogen replacement therapy.

Structure-activity relationships for α-calcitonin gene-related peptide

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a member of the calcitonin (CT) family of peptides. It is a widely distributed neuropeptide implicated in conditions such as neurogenic inflammation. With other members of the CT family, it shares an N-terminal disulphide-bonded ring which is essential for biological activity, an area of potential α-helix, and a C-terminal amide. CGRP binds to the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) in complex with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1), a member of the family B (or secretin-like) GPCRs. It can also activate other CLR or calcitonin-receptor/RAMP complexes. This 37 amino acid peptide comprises the N-terminal ring that is required for receptor activation (residues 1-7); an α-helix (residues 8-18), a region incorporating a β-bend (residues 19-26) and the C-terminal portion (residues 27-37), that is characterized by bends between residues 28-30 and 33-34. A few residues have been identified that seem to make major contributions to receptor binding and activation, with a larger number contributing either to minor interactions (which collectively may be significant), or to maintaining the conformation of the bound peptide. It is not clear if CGRP follows the pattern of other family B GPCRs in binding largely as an α-helix. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Neuropeptides. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-7 © 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) and related molecules in type 2 diabetes

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) is a widely distributed physiological enzyme that can be found solubilized in blood, or membrane-anchored in tissues. DPP IV and related dipeptidase enzymes cleave a wide range of physiological peptides and have been associated with several disease processes including Crohn's disease, chronic liver disease, osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis, eating disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and of direct relevance to this review, type 2 diabetes. Here, we place particular emphasis on two peptide substrates of DPP IV with insulin-releasing and antidiabetic actions namely, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). The rationale for inhibiting DPP IV activity in type 2 diabetes is that it decreases peptide cleavage and thereby enhances endogenous incretin hormone activity. A multitude of novel DPP IV inhibitor compounds have now been developed and tested. Here we examine the information available on DPP IV and related enzymes, review recent preclinical and clinical data for DPP IV inhibitors, and assess their clinical significance.

Mapping interaction sites within the N-terminus of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor; the role of residues 23-60 of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor

The calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) acts as a receptor for the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) but in order to recognize CGRP, it must form a complex with an accessory protein, receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1). Identifying the protein/protein and protein/ligand interfaces in this unusual complex would aid drug design. The role of the extreme N-terminus of CLR (Glu23-Ala60) was examined by an alanine scan and the results were interpreted with the help of a molecular model. The potency of CGRP at stimulating cAMP production was reduced at Leu41Ala, Gln45Ala, Cys48Ala and Tyr49Ala; furthermore, CGRP-induced receptor internalization at all of these receptors was also impaired. Ile32Ala, Gly35Ala and Thr37Ala all increased CGRP potency. CGRP specific binding was abolished at Leu41Ala, Ala44Leu, Cys48Ala and Tyr49Ala. There was significant impairment of cell surface expression of Gln45Ala, Cys48Ala and Tyr49Ala. Cys48 takes part in a highly conserved disulfide bond and is probably needed for correct folding of CLR. The model suggests that Gln45 and Tyr49 mediate their effects by interacting with RAMP1 whereas Leu41 and Ala44 are likely to be involved in binding CGRP. Ile32, Gly35 and Thr37 form a separate cluster of residues which modulate CGRP binding. The results from this study may be applicable to other family B GPCRs which can associate with RAMPs.

Are transglutaminase 2 inhibitors able to reduce gliadin-induced toxicity related to celiac disease? A proof-of-concept study

Purpose Celiac disease is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy characterized by adaptive and innate immune responses to dietary gluten in wheat, rye and barley in genetically susceptible individuals. Gluten-derived gliadin peptides are deamidated by transglutaminase 2 (TG2), leading to an immune response in the small-intestinal mucosa. TG2 inhibitors have therefore been suggested as putative drugs for celiac disease. In this proof-of-concept study we investigated whether two TG2 inhibitors, cell-impermeable R281 and cell-permeable R283, can prevent the toxic effects of gliadin in vitro and ex vivo. Methods Intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells were treated with peptic-tryptic-digested gliadin (PT-gliadin) with or without TG2 inhibitors and thereafter direct toxic effects (transepithelial resistance, cytoskeletal rearrangement, junction protein expression and phoshorylation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2) were determined. In an organ culture of celiacpatient- derived small-intestinal biopsies we measured secretion of TG2-autoantibodies into the culture medium and the densities of CD25- and interleukin (IL) 15-positive cells, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)-positive regulatory Tcells (Tregs) and Ki-67- positive proliferating crypt cells. Results Both TG2 inhibitors evinced protective effects against gliadin-induced detrimental effects in Caco-2 cells but the cellimpermeableR281seemedslightlymorepotent. Inaddition,TG2 inhibitor R281 modified the gluten-induced increase in CD25- and IL15-positive cells,Tregs and crypt cell proliferation, but had no effect on antibody secretion in celiac-patient-derived biopsies. Conclusions Our results suggest that TG2 inhibitors are able to reduce certain gliadin-induced effects related to responses in vitro and ex vivo. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Receptor activity-modifying protein-dependent effects of mutations in the calcitonin receptor-like receptor:implications for adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide pharmacology

Background and Purpose Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) define the pharmacology of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). The interactions of the different RAMPs with this class B GPCR yield high-affinity calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. However, the mechanism for this is unclear. Experimental Approach Guided by receptor models, we mutated residues in the N-terminal helix of CLR, RAMP2 and RAMP3 hypothesized to be involved in peptide interactions. These were assayed for cAMP production with AM, AM2 and CGRP together with their cell surface expression. Binding studies were also conducted for selected mutants. Key Results An important domain for peptide interactions on CLR from I32 to I52 was defined. Although I41 was universally important for binding and receptor function, the role of other residues depended on both ligand and RAMP. Peptide binding to CLR/RAMP3 involved a more restricted range of residues than that to CLR/RAMP1 or CLR/RAMP2. E101 of RAMP2 had a major role in AM interactions, and F111/W84 of RAMP2/3 was important with each peptide. Conclusions and Implications RAMP-dependent effects of CLR mutations suggest that the different RAMPs control accessibility of peptides to binding residues situated on the CLR N-terminus. RAMP3 appears to alter the role of specific residues at the CLR-RAMP interface compared with RAMP1 and RAMP2. © 2013 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley &. Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Pharmacological Society.

The integration of ProxiMAX randomisation with CIS display for the high-throughput production of novel peptides

Saturation mutagenesis is a powerful tool in modern protein engineering. This can allow the analysis of potential new properties thus allowing key residues within a protein to be targeted and randomised. However, the creation of large libraries using conventional saturation mutagenesis with degenerate codons (NNN or NNK) has inherent redundancy and disparities in residue representation. In this we describe the combination of ProxiMAX randomisation and CIS display for the use of generating novel peptides. Unlike other methods ProxiMAX randomisation does not require any intricate chemistry but simply utilises synthetic DNA and molecular biology techniques. Designed ‘MAX’ oligonucleotides were ligated, amplified and digested in an iterative cycle. Results show that randomised ‘MAX’ codons can be added sequentially to the base sequence creating a series of randomised non-degenerate codons that can subsequently be inserted into a gene. CIS display (Isogencia, UK) is an in vitro DNA based screening method that creates a genotype to phenotype link between a peptide and the nucleic acid that encodes it. The use of straight forward in vitro transcription/translation and other molecular biology techniques permits ease of use along with flexibility making it a potent screening technique. Using ProxiMAX randomisation in combination with CIS display, the aim is to produce randomised anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) and calcitonin gene-related (CGRP) peptides to demonstrate the high-throughput nature of this combination.