Somatic cell gene therapy for diabetes mellitus: engineering a surrogate B-cell

Improved methods of insulin delivery are required for the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) to achieve a more physiological profile of glucose homeostasis. Somatic cell gene therapy offers the prospect that insulin could be delivered by an autologous cell implant, engineered to secrete insulin in response to glucose. This study explores the feasibility of manipulating somatic cells to behave as a surrogate insulin-secreting β-cells. Initial studies were conducted using mouse pituitary AtT20 cells as a model, since these cells possess an endogenous complement of enzymes capable of processing proinsulin to mature insulin. Glucose sensitive insulin secretion was conferred to these cells by transfection with plasmids containing the human preproinsulin gene (hppI-1) and the GLUT2 gene for the glucose transporter isoform 2. Insulin secretion was responsive to changes in the glucose concentration up to about 50μM. Further studies to up-rate this glucose sensitivity into the mM range will require manipulation of the hexokinase and glucokinase enzymes. Intraperitoneal implantation of the manipulated AtT20 cells into athymic nude mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes resulted in decreased plasma glucose concentrations. The cells formed vascularised tumours in vivo which were shown to contain insulin-secreting cells. To achieve proinsulin processing in non-endocrine cells, co-transfection with a suitable enzyme, or mutagenesis of the proinsulin itself are necessary. The mutation of the human preproinsulin gene to the consensus sequence for cleavage by the subtilisin-like serine protease, furin, was carried out. Co-transfection of human fibroblasts with wild-type proinsulin and furin resulted in 58% conversion to mature insulin by these cells. Intraperitoneal implantation of the mature-insulin secreting human fibroblasts into the diabetic nude mouse animal model gave less encouraging results than the AtT20 cells, apparently due to poor vascularisation. Cell aggregations removed from the mice at autopsy were shown to contain insulin secreting cells only at the periphery. This thesis provides evidence that it is possible to construct, by cellular engineering, a glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting surrogate β-cell. Therefore, somatic cell gene therapy offers a feasible alternative for insulin delivery in IDDM patients.

How accurate are photographic surrogate markers used to detect macular edema in the English national screening programme?

DESIGN. Retrospective analysis PURPOSE. Macular oedema is not directly visible on two dimensional digital photographs such that surrogate markers need to be used. In the English National Screening Programme these are exudate within one optic disc diameter (DD) of the fovea, group of exudates within two DD of the fovea and haemorrhages or microaneurysms (HMA) within one DD of the fovea with best corrected visual acuity (VA) worse than 6/9. All patients who present with any of these surrogate markers at screening are referred to an ophthalmology clinic for slit lamp examination. The purpose of this audit was to determine how many patients with positive maculopathy diagnosis on photography were truly identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT) with macular oedema. METHODS. Data was collected from patients attending digital diabetic retinopathy screening. Patients who presented with surrogate markers for macular oedema also had an OCT scan. The fast macula scan on the Stratus OCT was used and an ophthalmologist reviewed the scans to determine whether macular oedema was present. RESULTS. Maculopathy by exudates: Of 155 patients 45 (29%) showed thickening on the OCT of these 12 required laser. Those who also had pre-proliferative retinopathy (n=20) were more likely to have macular oedema (75%) than those with background diabetic retinopathy. Maculopathy by HMA and VA worse than 6/9: Of 66 patients 11 (16.7%) showed thickening on the OCT. 5 (7.6%) of these had macular oedema, 5 (7.6%) epi-retinal membrane, and 1 (1.5%) age related macular degeneration. None of these patients required laser. CONCLUSIONS. The likelihood of the presence of macular oedema and requiring laser treatment is greater with macular exudation than HMA within one DD and reduced VA. Overall the surrogate markers used show low specificity for macular oedema, however combining OCT with photography does identify those with macular oedema who require a true referral for an ophthalmological slit lamp examination.