Immunochemical detection of UV-induced DNA damage and repair

The application of an antiserum to ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-damaged DNA is presented. A novel experimental system was employed to ascertain the limits of detection for this antiserum. Using a DNA standard containing a known amount of dimer, the limits of detection were found to be 0.9 fmol of dimer. This was compared to a limit of 20-50 fmol dimer using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Induction of thymine dimers in DNA following UVR exposure, as assessed using this antiserum in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), was compared with GC-MS measurements. The ELISA method successfully demonstrated the induction of lesions in DNA irradiated either with UVC or UVB, although despite high sensitivity, no discernible binding was seen to UVA-irradiated DNA. The antiserum was also shown to be applicable to immunocytochemistry, localising damage in the nuclei of UVR exposed keratinocytes in culture. The ability of the antiserum to detect DNA damage in skin biopsies of individuals exposed to sub-erythemal doses of UVR was also demonstrated. Moreover, the subsequent removal of this damage, as evidenced by a reduction in antiserum staining, was noted in sections of biopsies taken in the hours following irradiation. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Photonic skin for pressure and strain sensing

In this paper, we report on the strain and pressure testing of highly flexible skins embedded with Bragg grating sensors recorded in either silica or polymer optical fibre. The photonic skins, with a size of 10cm x 10cm and thickness of 1mm, were fabricated by embedding the polymer fibre or silica fibre containing Bragg gratings in Sylgard 184 from Dow Corning. Pressure sensing was studied using a cylindrical metal post placed on an array of points across the skin. The polymer fibre grating exhibits approximately 10 times the pressure sensitivity of the silica fibre and responds to the post even when it is placed a few centimetres away from the sensing fibre. Although the intrinsic strain sensitivities of gratings in the two fibre types are very similar, when embedded in the skin the polymer grating displayed a strain sensitivity approximately 45 times greater than the silica device, which also suffered from considerable hysteresis. The polymer grating displayed a near linear response over wavelength shifts of 9nm for 1% strain. The difference in behaviour we attribute to the much greater Young's modulus of the silica fibre (70 GPa) compared to the polymer fibre (3 GPa).