Retinitis pigmentosa and the new genetics

This article describes the recent advances that have been made in understanding the molecular genetics of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The basic clinical and pathological aspects of RP will be described, together with the patterns of inheritance exhibited by the disorder. In addition, the most important genes that have been linked to RP will be discussed as well as the advances in molecular genetics which have led to the identification of mutations in these genes.

Carotenoids and ocular disease: a review

Background: Carotenoids are not considered to be essential nutrients, but their antioxidant and photoprotective properties have prompted interest in their potential role in disease prevention. Our aim is to review the evidence In relation to ocular disease. Method: Web of Science and Medline via PubMed database search. Results Lutein and zeaxanthin intake has been associated with a 22% reduced risk of cataract extraction in women (RR 0.78, p = 0.04), and a 19% lower risk of cataract in men (RR 0.8, p = 0, 03). A randomised controlled trial (RCT) found a significant improvement in visual acuity in cataract patients supplemented with lutein. Two RCTs investigating the effect of P-carotene, in combination with other nutrients, on cataract report conflicting results. Several studies show no inverse association between cataract and P-carotene. Lutein and zeaxanthin are the only carotenoids found in the human macula. RCTs have found beneficial effects of both lutein and beta-carotene supplementation, in combination with other antioxidants, on visual function age-related macular disease affected subjects. Evidence for a role of lutein in preventing deterioration of visual function in retinitis pigmentosa patients is conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Further research into the role of lutein and zeaxanthin in prevention of onset and progression of ocular disease is warranted.

The investigation of the sensitivity gradient of the visual field, as a function of stimulus dynamic range, in the normal and abnormal eye

The study utilized the advanced technology provided by automated perimeters to investigate the hypothesis that patients with retinitis pigmentosa behave atypically over the dynamic range and to concurrently determine the influence of extraneous factors on the format of the normal perimetric sensitivity profile. The perimetric processing of some patients with retinitis pigmentosa was considered to be abnormal in either the temporal and/or the spatial domain. The standard size III stimulus saturated the central regions and was thus ineffective in detecting early depressions in sensitivity in these areas. When stimulus size was scaled in inverse proportion to the square root of ganglion cell receptive field density (M-scaled), isosensitive profiles did not result, although cortical representation was theoretically equivalent across the visual field. It was conjectured that this was due to variations in the ganglion cell characteristics with increasing peripheral angle, most notably spatial summation. It was concluded that the development of perimetric routines incorporating stimulus sizes adjusted in proportion to the coverage factor of retinal ganglion cells would enhance the diagnostic capacity of perimetry. Good general and local correspondence was found between perimetric sensitivity and the available retinal cell counts. Intraocular light scatter arising both from simulations and media opacities depressed perimetric sensitivity. Attenuation was greater centrally for the smaller LED stimuli, whereas the reverse was true for the larger projected stimuli. Prior perimetric experience and pupil size also demonstrated eccentricity-dependent effect on sensitivity. Practice improved perimetric sensitivity for projected stimuli at eccentricities greater than or equal to 30o; particularly in the superior region. Increase in pupil size for LED stimuli enhanced sensitivity at eccentricities greater than 10o. Conversely, microfluctuation in the accommodative response during perimetric examination and the correction of peripheral refractive error had no significant influence on perimetric sensitivity.