Zwitterionic and charge-balanced (polyampholyte) copolymer hydrogels

Zwitterionic compounds, or zwitterions, are electrically neutral compounds having an equal number of formal unit charges of opposite sign. In common polyzwitterions the zwitterionic groups are usually located in pendent groups rather than the backbone of the macromolecule. Polyzwitterions contain both the anion and cation in the same monomeric unit, unlike polyampholytes which can contain the anion and cation in different monomeric units. The use of cationic and anionic monomers (or monomers capable of becoming charged) in stoichiometric equivalent proportions produces charge-balanced polyampholyte copolymers. Hydrogel materials produced from zwitterionic monomers have been proposed for use and are used in many biomaterial applications but synthetic charge-balanced polyampholyte are less common. Certain properties of hydrogels which are important for their successful use as biomaterials, these include the equilibrium water content, mechanical, surface energy, oxygen permeability, swelling and the coefficient of friction. The zwitterionic monomer N,N-dimethyl-N-(2-acryloylethyl)-N-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium betaine (SPDA) was synthesized with 2-hydroxyethly acrylate (HEMA) as the comonomer to produce a series of polyzwitterion hydrogels. To produce charged-balanced copolymer hydrogels two “cationic” monomers were selected; 2-(diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) and 3-(dimethylamino) propyl methacrylamide (DMAPMA) and an anionic monomer; 2-acrylamido 2,2 methylpropane sulphonic acid (AMPS). Two series’ of charge-balanced copolymers were synthesized from stoichiometric equivalent ratios of DMAEMA or DMAPMA and AMPS with HEMA as a terpolymer. The zwitterionic copolymer and both charge-balanced copolymers produced clear, cohesive hydrogels. The zwitterionic and charge-balanced copolymers displayed similar EWC’s along with similar mechanical and surface energy properties. The swelling of the zwitterionic copolymer displayed antipolyelectrolyte behavior whereas the charge-balanced copolymers displayed behaviour somewhere between this and a typical polyelectrolyte. This work describes some aspects of the polymerisation and properties of SPDA copolymers and charge-balanced (polyampholyte) copolymers relevant to their potential as biomedical / bioresponsive materials. The biomimetic nature of SPDA together with its compatibility with other monomers makes it a useful and complimentary addition to the building blocks of biomaterials.

Wideband-tuneable, nanotube mode-locked, fibre laser

Ultrashort-pulse lasers with spectral tuning capability have widespread applications in fields such as spectroscopy, biomedical research and telecommunications1–3. Mode-locked fibre lasers are convenient and powerful sources of ultrashort pulses4, and the inclusion of a broadband saturable absorber as a passive optical switch inside the laser cavity may offer tuneability over a range of wavelengths5. Semiconductor saturable absorber mirrors are widely used in fibre lasers4–6, but their operating range is typically limited to a few tens of nanometres7,8, and their fabrication can be challenging in the 1.3–1.5 mm wavelength region used for optical communications9,10. Single-walled carbon nanotubes are excellent saturable absorbers because of their subpicosecond recovery time, low saturation intensity, polarization insensitivity, and mechanical and environmental robustness11–16. Here, we engineer a nanotube–polycarbonate film with a wide bandwidth (>300 nm) around 1.55 mm, and then use it to demonstrate a 2.4 ps Er31-doped fibre laser that is tuneable from 1,518 to 1,558 nm. In principle, different diameters and chiralities of nanotubes could be combined to enable compact, mode-locked fibre lasers that are tuneable over a much broader range of wavelengths than other systems.

Hanchett-Stamford V (1) HM Attorney-General and (2) Dr William Johnston Jordan [2008] Ewhc 330 (CH), 2008 WL 1968855

Casenote considers meaning and impact of ruling of High Court in Hanchett Stamford v HM A.G. The decision of Mr Justice Lewison in Hanchett-Stamford v HM Attorney General and Dr William Johnston Jordan1 provides us with a useful analysis of the legal principles relating to the thorny issues of: (i) how unincorporated associations hold property; (ii) the applicability of the law of charities to unincorporated associations and (iii) the property rights of a declining membership upon the dissolution of such associations.