1 resultado para Naturalization of Phenomenology
em Aston University Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (17)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (74)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (7)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (33)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (513)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (39)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (45)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
In three experiments, we manipulated participants' perceived numerical status and compared the originality and creativity of arguments generated by members of numerical minorities and majorities. Independent judges, blind to experimental conditions, rated participants' written arguments. In Studies 1 and 2, we found that participants assigned to a numerical minority generated more original arguments when advocating their own position than did numerical majorities. In Study 3, an equal-factions control group was included in the design, and all participants were instructed to argue for a counter-attitudinal position. Those in the numerical minority generated more creative arguments than those in both the majority and equal-factions conditions, but not stronger arguments. We propose cognitive and social processes that may underlie our obtained effects and discuss implications for minority influence research.