Flavones and related compounds as inhibitors of protein tyrosine kinases

Aberrant tyrosine protein kinase activity has been implicated in the formation and maintenance of malignancy and so presents a potential target for cancer chemotherapy. Quercetin, a naturally occuring flavonoid, inhibits the tyrosine protein kinase encoded by the Rous sarcoma virus but also exhibits many other effects. Analogues of this compound were synthesised by the acylation of suitable 2-hydroxyacetophenones with appropriately substituted aromatic (or alicyclic) acid chlorides, followed by base catalysed rearrangement to the 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropan-1,3-diones. Acid catalysed ring closure furnished flavones. The majority of the 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropan-1,3-diones were shown by NMR to exist in the enol form. This was supported by the crystal structure of 1-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropan-1,3-dione. In contrast, 1.(4,6-dimethoxy-2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropan-1,3-dione did not exhibit keto-enol tautomerism in the NMR spectrum and was shown in its crystal structure to assume a twisted conformation. Assessment of the biological activity of the analogues of quercetin was carried out using whole cells and the kinase domain of the tyrosine protein kinase encoded by the Abelson murine leukaemia virus, ptab150 kinase. Single cell suspension cultures and clonogenic potential of murine fibroblasts transformed by the Abelson Murine leukaemia virus (ANN-1 cells) did not indicate the existence of any structure activity relationship required for cytotoxicity or cytostasis. No selective toxicity was apparent when the `normal' parent cell line, (3T3), was used to assess the cytotoxic potential of quercetin. The ICS50 for these compounds were generally in the region of 1-100M. The potential for these compounds to inhibit ptab150 kinase was determined. A definite substitution requirement emerged from these experiments indicating a necessity for substituents in the A ring or in the 3-position of the flavone nucleus. Kinetic data showed these inhibitors to be competitive for ATP.

Polarized secretion of leukemia inhibitory factor

Background: The direction of cytokine secretion from polarized cells determines the cytokine's cellular targets. Leukemia inhibitory factor LIF) belongs to the interleukin-6 IL-6) family of cytokines and signals through LIFR/gp130. Three factors which may regulate the direction of LIF secretion were studied: the site of stimulation, signal peptides, and expression levels. Stimulation with IL-1 beta is known to promote IL-6 secretion from the stimulated membrane apical or basolateral) in the human intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2. Since LIF is related to IL-6, LIF secretion was also tested in Caco-2 following IL-1 beta stimulation. Signal peptides may influence the trafficking of LIF. Two isoforms of murine LIF, LIF-M and LIF-D, encode different signal peptides which have been associated with different locations of the mature protein in fibroblasts. To determine the effect of the signal peptides on LIF secretion, secretion levels were compared in Madin-Darby canine kidney MDCK) clones which expressed murine LIF-M or LIF-D or human LIF under the control of an inducible promoter. Low and high levels of LIF expression were also compared since saturation of the apical or basolateral route would reveal specific transporters for LIF. Results: When Caco-2 was grown on permeable supports, LIF was secreted constitutively with around 40% secreted into the apical chamber. Stimulation with IL-1 beta increased LIF production. After treating the apical surface with IL-1 beta, the percentage secreted apically remained similar to the untreated, whereas, when the cells were stimulated at the basolateral surface only 20% was secreted apically. In MDCK cells, an endogenous LIF-like protein was detected entirely in the apical compartment. The two mLIF isoforms showed no difference in their secretion patterns in MDCK. Interestingly, about 70% of murine and human LIF was secreted apically from MDCK over a 400-fold range of expression levels within clones and a 200,000-fold range across clones. Conclusion: The site of stimulation affected the polarity of LIF secretion, while, signal peptides and expression levels did not. Exogenous LIF is transported in MDCK without readily saturated steps.