Pediatric CNS pathophysiology

Research in pediatric central nervous system pathophysiology is focused around three primary goals: identification of neurodevelopmental disorders, understanding the differences in brain development which underlie these disorders, and improving treatment for these young children. Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are a complex set of disorders which are characterized by difficulties in language and social interactions. These behavioral measures are highly variable and a number of underlying causes can generate similar behavioral effects. Therefore, it is important to identify neurophysiological markers to better identify and characterize these disorders. Recent ASD findings using MEG show atypical latency and amplitude responses and poor cortical connectivity in children with ASDs across the cognitive spectrum from basic auditory processing, multisensory integration, to face and semantic processing. These results further support the view that ASDs are a complex neurologically-based disorder. On the other hand, the cause of Down syndrome is well understood as originating from a partial or full replication of chromosome 21. However, the cognitive and neurological consequences of this chromosomal abnormality are not yet well understood. Using a simple observation and motor execution task, poor functional connectivity in sensory-motor areas, particularly in the gamma band range, has been identified in children with Down syndrome and is consistent with behavioral deficits in the sensory-motor realm. Additional studies are needed to better understand whether targeted identification of these abnormalities can facilitate treatment in this disorder. Finally, while epilepsy can be reliably diagnosed, seizure control is still limited in many cases where the seizure onset zone is not readily apparent. Advances in pre-surgical evaluation and intra-operative co-registration will be described. These studies describing pediatric CNS pathophysiology will be discussed. © Springer-Verlag 2010.

Prior action execution has no effect on corticospinal facilitation during action observation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used widely in research investigating corticospinal (CS) excitability during action observation. Generally, this work has shown that observation of an action performed by others, in the absence of overt movement, modulates the excitability of the CS pathway in humans. Despite the extent of the literature exploring action observation effects, however, there has been little research to date that has compared observation with the combination of observation and execution directly. Here, we report a single-pulse TMS study that investigated whether CS excitability during action observation was modulated by actions performed by the observers prior to viewing a ball pinching action. The results showed that CS excitability during action observation increased when compared to observation of a static hand, but that there was no additional motor facilitation when participants performed the same action prior to observing it. Our findings highlight the importance of action observation and its consequences on the CS system, whilst also illustrating the limited effect of prior action execution on the CS pathway for a simple action task.

Reflecting on mirror mechanisms:motor resonance effects during action observation only present with low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies indicate that the observation of other people's actions influences the excitability of the observer's motor system. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes typically increase in muscles which would be active during the execution of the observed action. This 'motor resonance' effect is thought to result from activity in mirror neuron regions, which enhance the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) via cortico-cortical pathways. The importance of TMS intensity has not yet been recognised in this area of research. Low-intensity TMS predominately activates corticospinal neurons indirectly, whereas high-intensity TMS can directly activate corticospinal axons. This indicates that motor resonance effects should be more prominent when using low-intensity TMS. A related issue is that TMS is typically applied over a single optimal scalp position (OSP) to simultaneously elicit MEPs from several muscles. Whether this confounds results, due to differences in the manner that TMS activates spatially separate cortical representations, has not yet been explored. In the current study, MEP amplitudes, resulting from single-pulse TMS applied over M1, were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles during the observation of simple finger abductions. We tested if the TMS intensity (110% vs. 130% resting motor threshold) or stimulating position (FDI-OSP vs. ADM-OSP) influenced the magnitude of the motor resonance effects. Results showed that the MEP facilitation recorded in the FDI muscle during the observation of index-finger abductions was only detected using low-intensity TMS. In contrast, changes in the OSP had a negligible effect on the presence of motor resonance effects in either the FDI or ADM muscles. These findings support the hypothesis that MN activity enhances M1 excitability via cortico-cortical pathways and highlight a methodological framework by which the neural underpinnings of action observation can be further explored. © 2013 Loporto et al.