Polarized secretion of leukemia inhibitory factor

Background: The direction of cytokine secretion from polarized cells determines the cytokine's cellular targets. Leukemia inhibitory factor LIF) belongs to the interleukin-6 IL-6) family of cytokines and signals through LIFR/gp130. Three factors which may regulate the direction of LIF secretion were studied: the site of stimulation, signal peptides, and expression levels. Stimulation with IL-1 beta is known to promote IL-6 secretion from the stimulated membrane apical or basolateral) in the human intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2. Since LIF is related to IL-6, LIF secretion was also tested in Caco-2 following IL-1 beta stimulation. Signal peptides may influence the trafficking of LIF. Two isoforms of murine LIF, LIF-M and LIF-D, encode different signal peptides which have been associated with different locations of the mature protein in fibroblasts. To determine the effect of the signal peptides on LIF secretion, secretion levels were compared in Madin-Darby canine kidney MDCK) clones which expressed murine LIF-M or LIF-D or human LIF under the control of an inducible promoter. Low and high levels of LIF expression were also compared since saturation of the apical or basolateral route would reveal specific transporters for LIF. Results: When Caco-2 was grown on permeable supports, LIF was secreted constitutively with around 40% secreted into the apical chamber. Stimulation with IL-1 beta increased LIF production. After treating the apical surface with IL-1 beta, the percentage secreted apically remained similar to the untreated, whereas, when the cells were stimulated at the basolateral surface only 20% was secreted apically. In MDCK cells, an endogenous LIF-like protein was detected entirely in the apical compartment. The two mLIF isoforms showed no difference in their secretion patterns in MDCK. Interestingly, about 70% of murine and human LIF was secreted apically from MDCK over a 400-fold range of expression levels within clones and a 200,000-fold range across clones. Conclusion: The site of stimulation affected the polarity of LIF secretion, while, signal peptides and expression levels did not. Exogenous LIF is transported in MDCK without readily saturated steps.

Polarised secretion of leukaemia inhibitory factor

Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a cytokine that is active on a wide variety of cells. Multiple LIF transcripts have been described. The transcripts LIF-D and LIF-M encode different signal peptides, which in mouse have been associated with differential localisation of the mature protein. LIF-D is associated with a freely diffusible protein, whereas the LIF-M is associated with the extracellular matrix. The polarity of LIF secretion has yet to be described and could illuminate the mechanisms of LIF localisation. Here the polarised endogenous secretion of human LIF and IL-6 in Caco-2 cells was characterised under normal culture conditions and following induction with IL-1b. Whether the apical or basolateral membrane was stimulated influenced the pattern of secretion (LIF: Unstimulated, 59% basolateral. Dual stimulation, 68% basolateral. Basolateral stimulation, 79% basolateral. Apical stimulation, 53% basolateral). IL-6 displayed a similar dependence on the site of stimulation but was predominantly secreted at the membrane that was stimulated. To determine the effect of the alternate signal peptides on the polarity of LIF secretion, LIF was epitope tagged with FLAG. Epitope-tagging with FLAG was used to separate endogenous from exogenous protein expression. However, despite the normal biological activity of LIF-FLAG and detection of the FLAG in a western blot, detection of the LIF-FLAG under non-reducing conditions was not observed, and therefore it was unsuitable for secretion studies. Untagged LIF was expressed exogenously in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells under the control of a tetracycline response promoter that allowed a variety of LIF expression levels to be tested. Exogenous murine LIF was secreted predominantly from the apical (60%) membrane of MDCK cells irrespective of the signal peptide expressed.

GP130/OSMR is the only LIF/IL-6 family receptor complex to promote osteoblast differentiation of calvaria progenitors

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and its receptor (LIFR) are "twins" of Oncostatin M (OSM) and OSMR, respectively, likely having arisen through gene duplications. We compared their effects in a bone nodule-forming model of in vitro osteogenesis, rat calvaria (RC) cell cultures. Using a dominant-negative LIF mutant (hLIF-05), we showed that in RC cell cultures mouse OSM (mOSM) activates exclusively glycoprotein 130 (gp130)/OSMR. In treatments starting at early nodule formation stage, LIF, mOSM, IL-11, and IL-6 + sIL-6R inhibit bone nodule formation, that is, osteoprogenitor differentiation. Treatment with mOSM, and no other cytokine of the family, in early cultures (day 1-3 or 1-4) increases bone colony numbers. hLIF-05 also dose dependently stimulates bone nodule formation, confirming the inhibitory action of gp130/LIFR on osteogenesis. In pulse treatments at successive stages of bone nodule formation and maturation, LIF blocks osteocalcin (OCN) expression by differentiated osteoblasts, but has no effect on bonesialoprotein (BSP) expression. Mouse OSM inhibits OCN and BSP expression in preconfluent cultures with no or progressively reduced effects at later stages, reflecting the disruption of early nodules, possibly due to the strong apoptotic action of mOSM in RC cell cultures. In summary, LIFR and OSMR display differential effects on differentiation and phenotypic expression of osteogenic cells, most likely through different signal transduction pathways. In particular, gp130/OSMR is the only receptor complex of the family to stimulate osteoprogenitor differentiation in the RC cell culture model. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

NF-κB mediates proteolysis-inducing factor induced protein degradation and expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in skeletal muscle

Loss of skeletal muscle in cancer cachexia has a negative effect on both morbidity and mortality. The role of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) in regulating muscle protein degradation and expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway in response to a tumour cachectic factor, proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), has been studied by creating stable, transdominant-negative, muscle cell lines. Murine C2C12 myoblasts were transfected with plasmids with a CMV promoter that had mutations at the serine phosphorylation sites required for degradation of I-κBα, an NF-κB inhibitory protein, and allowed to differentiate into myotubes. Proteolysis-inducing factor induced degradation of I-κBα, nuclear accumulation of NF-κB and an increase in luciferase reporter gene activity in myotubes containing wild-type, but not mutant, I-κBα, proteins. Proteolysis-inducing factor also induced total protein degradation and loss of the myofibrillar protein myosin in myotubes containing wild-type, but not mutant, plasmids at the same concentrations as those causing activation of NF-κB. Proteolysis-inducing factor also induced increased expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, as determined by 'chymotrypsin-like' enzyme activity, the predominant proteolytic activity of the β-subunits of the proteasome, protein expression of 20S α-subunits and the 19S subunits MSSI and p42, as well as the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, E214k, in cells containing wild-type, but not mutant, I-κBα. The ability of mutant I-κBα to inhibit PIF-induced protein degradation, as well as expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, confirms that both of these responses depend on initiation of transcription by NF-κB. © 2005 Cancer Research UK.

Role of lipid-mobilising factor (LMF) in protecting tumour cells from oxidative damage

Lipid-mobilising factor (LMF) is produced by cachexia-inducing tumours and is involved in the degradation of adipose tissue, with increased oxidation of the released fatty acids through an induction of uncoupling protein (UCP) expression. Since UCP-2 is thought to be involved in the detoxification of free radicals if LMF induced UCP-2 expression in tumour cells, it might attenuate free radical toxicity. As a model system we have used MAC13 tumour cells, which do not produce LMF. Addition of LMF caused a concentration-dependent increase in UCP-2 expression, as determined by immunoblotting. This effect was attenuated by the β3 antagonist SR59230A, suggesting that it was mediated through a β3 adrenoreceptor. Co-incubation of LMF with MAC13 cells reduced the growth-inhibitory effects of bleomycin, paraquat and hydrogen peroxide, known to be free radical generators, but not chlorambucil, an alkylating agent. There was no effect of LMF alone on cellular proliferation. These results indicate that LMF antagonises the antiproliferative effect of agents working through a free radical mechanism, and may partly explain the unresponsiveness to the chemotherapy of cachexia-inducing tumours. © 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Increased expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in murine myotubes by proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) is associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B

Proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), isolated from a cachexia-inducing murine tumour, has been shown to stimulate protein breakdown in C 2C12 myotubes. The effect was attenuated by the specific proteasome inhibitor lactacystin and there was an elevation of proteasome 'chymotrypsin-like' enzyme activity and expression of 205 proteasome α-subunits at concentrations of PIF between 2 and 16 nM. Higher concentrations of PIF had no effect. The action of PIF was attenuated by eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (50 μM). At a concentration of 4 nM, PIF induced a transient decrease in IκBα levels after 30 min incubation, while no effect was seen at 20 nM PIF. The level of IκBα, an NF-κB inhibitory protein, returned to normal after 60 min. Depletion of IκBα from the cytosol was not seen in myotubes pretreated with EPA, suggesting that the NF-κB/IκB complex was stabilised. At concentrations between 2 and 8 nM, PIF stimulated an increased nuclear migration of NF-κB, which was not seen in myotubes pretreated with EPA. The PIF-induced increase in chymotrypsin-like enzyme activity was also attenuated by the NF-κB inhibitor peptide SN50, suggesting that NF-κB may be involved in the PIF-induced increase in proteasome expression. The results further suggest that EPA may attenuate protein degradation induced by PIF, at least partly, by preventing NF-κB accumulation in the nucleus. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.

Mechanism of attenuation of angiotensin-II-induced protein degradation by insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I)

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has been shown to attenuate protein degradation in murine myotubes induced by angiotensin II through downregulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, although the mechanism is not known. Angiotensin II is known to upregulate this pathway through a cellular signalling mechanism involving release of arachidonic acid, activation of protein kinase Cα (PKCα), degradation of inhibitor-κB (I-κB) and nuclear migration of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and all of these events were attenuated by IGF-I (13.2 nM). Induction of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway has been linked to activation of the RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR), since an inhibitor of PKR attenuated proteasome expression and activity in response to angiotensin II and prevented the decrease in the myofibrillar protein myosin. Angiotensin II induced phosphorylation of PKR and of the eukaryotic initiation factor-2 (eIF2) on the α-subunit, and this was attenuated by IGF-I, by induction of the expression of protein phosphatase 1, which dephosphorylates PKR. Release of arachidonic acid and activation of PKCα by angiotensin II were attenuated by an inhibitor of PKR and IGF-I, and the effect was reversed by Salubrinal (15 μM), an inhibitor of eIF2α dephosphorylation, as was activation of PKCα. In addition myotubes transfected with a dominant-negative PKR (PKRΔ6) showed no release of arachidonate in response to Ang II, and no activation of PKCα. These results suggest that phosphorylation of PKR by angiotensin II was responsible for the activation of the PLA2/PKC pathway leading to activation of NF-κB and that IGF-I attenuates protein degradation due to an inhibitory effect on activation of PKR. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.