Short-term stability in refractive status despite large fluctuations in glucose levels in diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2

Purpose: This work investigates how short-term changes in blood glucose concentration affect the refractive components of the diabetic eye in patients with long-term Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Methods: Blood glucose concentration, refractive error components (mean spherical equivalent MSE, J0, J45), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL) and ocular aberrations were monitored at two-hourly intervals over a 12-hour period in: 20 T1DM patients (mean age ± SD) 38±14 years, baseline HbA1c 8.6±1.9%; 21 T2DM patients (mean age ± SD) 56±11 years, HbA1c 7.5±1.8%; and in 20 control subjects (mean age ± SD) 49±23 years, HbA1c 5.5±0.5%. The refractive and biometric results were compared with the corresponding changes in blood glucose concentration. Results: Blood glucose concentration at different times was found to vary significantly within (p<0.0005) and between groups (p<0.0005). However, the refractive error components and ocular aberrations were not found to alter significantly over the day in either the diabetic patients or the control subjects (p>0.05). Minor changes of marginal statistical or optical significance were observed in some biometric parameters. Similarly there were some marginally significant differences between the baseline biometric parameters of well-controlled and poorly-controlled diabetic subjects. Conclusion: This work suggests that normal, short-term fluctuations (of up to about 6 mM/l on a timescale of a few hours) in the blood glucose levels of diabetics are not usually associated with acute changes in refractive error or ocular wavefront aberrations. It is therefore possible that factors other than refractive error fluctuations are sometimes responsible for the transient visual problems often reported by diabetic patients. © 2012 Huntjens et al.

Abnormal retinal vascular reactivity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance:a preliminary study

To investigate the relationship between vascular function parameters measured at the retinal and systemic level and known markers for cardiovascular risk in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Sixty age- and gender- matched White-European adults (30 IGT and 30 normal glucose tolerance -NGT) were recruited for the study. Fasting plasma glucose, lipids and 24-hour blood pressure (BP) was measured in all subjects. Systemic vascular and endothelial function was assessed using carotid-artery intimal media thickness (cIMT) and flow mediated dilation (FMD). Retinal vascular reactivity was assessed by the Dynamic Retinal Vessel Analyser (DVA). Additionally, blood glutathione (GSH, GSSG and tGSH) and plasma von-Willebrand (vWF) factor levels were also measured. Individuals with IGT demonstrated higher BP values (p<0.001), fasting TG and TG:HDL ratios (p<0.001) than NGT subjects. Furthermore, Total:HDL-C ratios and Framingham scores were raised (p=0.010 and p<0.001 respectively). Blood glutathione levels (GSH, GSSG and tGSH) were lower (p<0.001, p=0.039 and p<0.001 respectively) while plasma vWF was increased (p=0.014) in IGT subjects compared to controls. IGT individuals also demonstrated higher IMT in right and left carotid arteries (p=0.017 and p=0.005, respectively) alongside larger brachial artery diameter (p=0.015), lower FMD% (p=0.026) and GTN induced dilation (GID) (p=0.012) than healthy controls. At the retinal arterial level, the IGT subjects showed higher baseline fluctuations (BDF) (p=0.026), longer reaction time (RT) (p=0.032) and reduced baseline-corrected flicker response (bFR) (p=0.045). In IGT subjects retinal BDF correlated with and Total:HDL (p= 0.003) and HDL-C (p= 0.004). Arterial RT also correlated with FMD (p=0.017) in IGT but not NGT subjects. In IGT individuals there is a relationship between macro- and microvascular function, as well as a direct correlation between the observed retinal microcirculatory changes and established plasma markers for CVD. Multifactorial preventive interventions to decrease vascular risk in these individuals should be considered.