Putting children forward for epilepsy surgery:a qualitative study of UK parents' and health professionals' decision-making experiences

Background Against a backdrop of recommendations for increasing access to and uptake of early surgical intervention for children with medically intractable epilepsy, it is important to understand how parents and professionals decide to put children forward for epilepsy surgery and what their decisional support needs are. Aim The aim of this study was to explore how parents and health professionals make decisions regarding putting children forward for pediatric epilepsy surgery. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with nine parents of children who had undergone pediatric epilepsy surgery at a specialist children's hospital and ten healthcare professionals who made up the children's epilepsy surgery service multidisciplinary healthcare team (MDT). Three MDT meetings were also observed. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings Four themes were generated from analysis of interviews with parents: presentation of surgery as a treatment option, decision-making, looking back, and interventions. Three themes were generated from analysis of interviews/observations with health professionals: triangulating information, team working, and patient and family perspectives. Discussion Parents wanted more information and support in deciding to put their child forward for epilepsy surgery. They attempted to balance the potential benefits of surgery against any risks of harm. For health professionals, a multidisciplinary approach was seen as crucial to the decision-making process. Advocating for the family was perceived to be the responsibility of nonmedical professionals. Conclusion Decision-making can be supported by incorporating families into discussions regarding epilepsy surgery as a potential treatment option earlier in the process and by providing families with additional information and access to other parents with similar experiences.

The value of magnetoencephalography to guide electrode implantation in epilepsy

Purpose: To investigate if magnetoencephalography (MEG) can identify implantation sites for intracranial recordings (IR). Method: Two groups of 12 patients assessed for surgery with IR with and without MEG were compared (MEG and control groups). In the control group, non-invasive presurgical assessment without MEG suggested clear hypotheses for implantation. In the MEG group, non-invasive assessment was inconclusive, and MEG was used to identify implantation sites. Both groups were matched for implantation type. The success of implantation was defined by findings in IR: a) Focal seizure onset; b)Unilateral focal abnormal responses to single pulse electrical stimulation(SPES); and c) Concordance between a) and b). Results: In all MEG patients, at least one virtual MEG electrode generated suitable hypotheses for the location of implantations. The proportion of patients showing focal seizure onset restricted to one hemisphere was similar in control and MEG groups (6/12 vs. 11/12, Fisher’s exact test,p = 0.0686). The proportion of patients showing unilateral responses to SPES was lower in the control than in the MEG group (7/12 vs. 12/12,p = 0.0373). Conclusion: The MEG group showed similar or higher incidence of successful implantations than controls.