1 resultado para Debtor and creditor (Roman law)
em Aston University Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (23)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (4)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (47)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (7)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (6)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (56)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (223)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (397)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (8)
Resumo:
This article begins by setting out the human rights provisions that apply to social media expression. It then provides insight into the part social media plays within our society by analysing the social media landscape and how it facilitates a ‘purer’ form of expression. The social media paradox is explored through the lens of current societal issues and concerns regarding the use of social media and how these have manifested into litigation. It concludes by analysing the tension that the application of an array of criminal legislation and jurisprudence has created with freedom of expression, and whether this can successfully mitigated by the Director of Public Prosecution’s Interim Guidelines.