Chemical synthesis of isotopically labelled (M+4) purine nucleosides and their incorporation into DNA oligomers

Development of accurate and sensitive analytical methods to measure the level of biomarkers, such as 8-oxo-guanine or its corresponding nucleoside, 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine, has become imperative in the study of DNA oxidative damage in vivo. Of the most promising techniques, HPLC-MS/MS, has many attractive advantages. Like any method that employs the MS technique, its accuracy depends on the use of multiply, isotopically-labelled internal standards. This project is aimed at making available such internal standards. The first task was to synthesise the multiply, isotopically-labelled bases (M+4) guanine and (M+4) 8-oxo-guanine. Synthetic routes for both (M+4) guanine and (M+4) 8-oxo-guanine were designed and validated using the unlabelled compounds. The reaction conditions were also optimized during the “dry runs”. The amination of the 4-hydroxy-2,6-dichloropyrimidine, appeared to be very sensitive to the purity of the commercial [15]N benzylamine reagent. Having failed, after several attempts, to obtain the pure reagent from commercial suppliers, [15]N benzylamine was successfully synthesised in our laboratory and used in the first synthesis of (M+4) guanine. Although (M+4) bases can be, and indeed have been used as internal standards in the quantitative analysis of oxidative damage, they can not account for the errors that may occur during the early sample preparation stages. Therefore, internal standards in the form of nucleosides and DNA oligomers are more desirable. After evaluating a number of methods, an enzymatic transglycolization technique was adopted for the transfer of the labelled bases to give their corresponding nucleosides. Both (M+4) 2-deoxyguanosine and (M+4) 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine can be purified on micro scale by HPLC. The challenge came from the purification of larger scale (>50 mg) synthesis of nucleosides. A gel filtration method was successfully developed, which resulted in excellent separation of (M+4) 2’-deoxyguanosine from the incubation mixture. The (M+4) 2’-deoxyguanosine was then fully protected in three steps and successfully incorporated, by solid supported synthesis, into a DNA oligomer containing 18 residues. Thus, synthesis of 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine on a bigger scale for its future incorporation into DNA oligomers is now a possibility resulting from this thesis work. We believe that these internal standards can be used to develop procedures that can make the measurement of oxidative DNA damage more accurate and sensitive.

Right hemisphere contributions to imitation tasks

Humans imitate biological movements faster than non-biological movements. The faster response has been attributed to an activation of the human mirror neuron system, which is thought to match observation and execution of actions. However, it is unclear which cortical areas are responsible for this behavioural advantage. Also, little is known about the timing of activations. Using whole-head magnetoencephalography we recorded neuronal responses to single biological finger movements and non-biological dot movements while the subjects were required to perform an imitation task or an observation task, respectively. Previous imaging studies on the human mirror neurone system suggested that activation in response to biological movements would be stronger in ventral premotor, parietal and superior temporal regions. In accordance with previous studies, reaction times to biological movements were faster than those to dot movements in all subjects. The analysis of evoked magnetic fields revealed that the reaction time benefit was paralleled by stronger and earlier activation of the left temporo-occipital cortex, right superior temporal area and right ventral motor/premotor area. The activity patterns suggest that the latter areas mediate the observed behavioural advantage of biological movements and indicate a predominant contribution of the right temporo-frontal hemisphere to action observation–execution matching processes in intransitive movements, which has not been reported previously.

Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements

Our motor and perceptual representations of actions seem to be intimately linked and the human mirror neuron system (MNS) has been proposed as the mediator. In two experiments, we presented biological or non-biological movement stimuli that were either congruent or incongruent to a required response prompted by a tone. When the tone occurred with the onset of the last movement in a series, i.e., it was perceived during the movement presentation, congruent biological stimuli resulted in faster reaction times than congruent non-biological stimuli. The opposite was observed for incongruent stimuli. When the tone was presented after visual movement stimulation, however, no such interaction was present. This implies that biological movement stimuli only affect motor behaviour during visual processing but not thereafter. These data suggest that the MNS is an “online” system; longstanding repetitive visual stimulation (Experiment 1) has no benefit in comparison to only one or two repetitions (Experiment 2).

Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements

The human mirror neuron system (MNS) has recently been a major topic of research in cognitive neuroscience. As a very basic reflection of the MNS, human observers are faster at imitating a biological as compared with a non-biological movement. However, it is unclear which cortical areas and their interactions (synchronization) are responsible for this behavioural advantage. We investigated the time course of long-range synchronization within cortical networks during an imitation task in 10 healthy participants by means of whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG). Extending previous work, we conclude that left ventrolateral premotor, bilateral temporal and parietal areas mediate the observed behavioural advantage of biological movements in close interaction with the basal ganglia and other motor areas (cerebellum, sensorimotor cortex). Besides left ventrolateral premotor cortex, we identified the right temporal pole and the posterior parietal cortex as important junctions for the integration of information from different sources in imitation tasks that are controlled for movement (biological vs. non-biological) and that involve a certain amount of spatial orienting of attention. Finally, we also found the basal ganglia to participate at an early stage in the processing of biological movement, possibly by selecting suitable motor programs that match the stimulus.