1 resultado para Asset Pricing, Expectations, Beta
em Aston University Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (16)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (31)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (91)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (3)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (42)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (270)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (8)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (288)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (51)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (3)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (25)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
Using a simulation analysis we show that non-trading can cause an overstatement of the observed illiquidity ratio. Our paper shows how this overstatement can be eliminated with a very simple adjustment to the Amihud illiquidity ratio. We find that the adjustment improves the relationship between the illiquidity ratio and measures of illiquidity calculated from transaction data. Asset pricing tests show that without the adjustment, illiquidity premia estimates can be understated by more than 17% for NYSE securities and by more than 24% for NASDAQ securities.