Governance in contemporary Germany:the semisovereign State revisited

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, West Germany was considered to be one of the world’s most successful economic and political systems. In his seminal 1987 analysis of West Germany’s ‘semisovereign’ system of governance, Peter Katzenstein attributed this success to a combination of a fragmented polity, consensus politics and incremental policy changes. However, unification in 1990 has both changed Germany’s institutional configuration and created economic and social challenges on a huge scale. This volume therefore asks whether semisovereignty still exists in contemporary Germany and, crucially, whether it remains an asset in terms of addressing these challenges. By shadowing and building on the original study, an eminent team of British, German and American scholars analyses institutional changes and the resulting policy developments in key sectors, with Peter Katzenstein himself providing the conclusion. Together, the chapters provide a landmark assessment of the outcomes produced by one of the world’s most important countries. Contents: 1. Introduction: semisovereignty challenged Simon Green and William E. Paterson; 2. Institutional transfer: can semisovereignty be transferred? The political economy of Eastern Germany Wade Jacoby; 3. Political parties Thomas Saalfeld; 4. Federalism: the new territorialism Charlie Jeffery; 5. Shock-absorbers under stress. Parapublic institutions and the double challenges of German unification and European integration Andreas Busch; 6. Economic policy management: catastrophic equilibrium, tipping points and crisis interventions Kenneth Dyson; 7. Industrial relations: from state weakness as strength to state weakness as weakness. Welfare corporatism and the private use of the public interest Wolfgang Streeck; 8. Social policy: crisis and transformation Roland Czada; 9. Immigration and integration policy: between incrementalism and non-decisions Simon Green; 10. Environmental policy: the law of diminishing returns? Charles Lees; 11. Administrative reform Kluas H. Goetz; 12. European policy-making: between associated sovereignty and semisovereignty William E. Paterson; 13. Conclusion: semisovereignty in United Germany Peter J. Katzenstein.

Mediators of gram-positive septic shock

Septic shock can occur as a result of Gram-negative or Gram-positive infection and involves a complex interaction between bacterial factors and the host immune system producing a systemic inflammatory state that may progress to multiple organ failure and death. Gram-positive bacteria are increasingly becoming more prevalent especially Staphylococcus epidermidis in association with indwelling devices. Lipopolysaccaride (LPS) is the key Gram-negative component involved in this process, but it is not clear which components of Gram-positive bacteria are responsible for progression of this often fatal disease. The aim of this thesis was to investigate the effect of bacterial components on the immune systems. Lipid S, a short chain form of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) found to be excreted from bacteria during growth in culture medium was examined along with other Gram-positive cell wall components: LTA, peptidoglycan (PG) and wall teichoic acids (WTA) and LPS from Gram-negative bacteria. Lipid S, LTA, PG and LPS but not WTA all stimulated murine macrophages and cell lines to produce significant amounts of NO, TNF-a, IL-6 and IL-1 and would induce fever and tissue damage seen in inflammatory diseases. Lipid S proved to be the most potent out of the Gram-positive samples tested. IgG antibodies in patients serum were found to bind to and cross react with lipid S and LTA. Anti-inflammatory antibiotics, platelet activating factor (PAF), PAF receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed to LTA, CD14 and toll-like receptors were utilised to modulate cytokine and NO production. In cell culture the anti-LTA and the anti-CD14 mAbs failed to markedly attenuate the production of NO, TNF-a, IL-6 or IL-1, the anti-TLR4 antibody did greatly inhibit the ability of LPS to stimulate cytokine production but not lipid S. The tetracyclines proved to be the most effective compounds, many were active at low concentrations and showed efficacy to inhibit both lipid S and LPS stimulated macrophages to produce NO.

Sustainable development, shock and awe? London 2012 and Civil Society

There is a disconnection between the top-down, elite, nature of sports mega-events and the ostensible redistributive and participatory sustainable development agendas staked out by BINGOs (Business-based International Non-Governmental Organizations) such as the contemporary International Olympic Committee (IOC). Focusing specifically on the London 2012 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games, we argue that, for all the environmental technology advances offered by sports mega-events, their dominant model remains one of a hollowed-out form of sustainable development. Despite significant technical and methodological innovations in environmental stewardship, the development model of the London Olympics remains predicated on the satisfaction of transnational investment flows. We discuss what this means for claims about the staging of a ‘green’ Olympic Games.